Verifying Visual Properties in Sentence Verification Facilitates Picture Recognition Memory
Abstract
Abstract. According to the perceptual symbols theory (Barsalou, 1999), sensorimotor simulations underlie the representation of concepts. We investigated whether recognition memory for pictures of concepts was facilitated by earlier representation of visual properties of those concepts. During study, concept names (e.g., apple) were presented in a property verification task with a visual property (e.g., shiny) or with a nonvisual property (e.g., tart). Delayed picture recognition memory was better if the concept name had been presented with a visual property than if it had been presented with a nonvisual property. These results indicate that modality-specific simulations are used for concept representation.
References
(1976). Instantiation of general terms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 667– 679
(2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32, 863– 873
(1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 471– 481
(1993). Flexibility, structure, and linguistic vagary in concepts: Manifestations of a compositional system of perceptual symbols. In A.F. Collins, S.E. Gathercole, M.A. Conway, & P.E. Morris (Eds.) Theories of memory (pp. 30-39). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
(1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577– 660
(2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 158– 167
(2005). Object concepts and action. In D. Pecher & R.A. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 8-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32, 863– 873
(2004). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A Comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111, 800– 807
(1987). Test differences in accessing bilingual memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 377– 391
(1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 1– 11
(1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1– 55
(2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 558– 565
(1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231– 262
(1997). Old/new differences in direct and indirect memory tests using pictures and words in within- and cross-form conditions: Event-related potential and behavioral measures. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 255– 272
(1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2006). Specialization and semantic organization: Evidence for multiple-semantics linked to sensory modalities. Memory and Cognition, 34, 60– 67
(1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519– 533
(2003). Verifying conceptual properties in different modalities produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119– 124
(2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 164– 167
(1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253– 336
(2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767– 780
(2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 330– 336
(2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153– 156
(2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625– 636
(2003). Semantic context effects and priming in word association. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 653– 660
(2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B.H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 43, pp. 35-62). New York: Academic Press.
(2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R.A. Zwaan (Eds.), The grounding of cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168– 171