Skip to main content
Log in

Explaining Competitors' Reactions to New Product Introductions: The Roles of Event Characteristics, Managerial Interpretation, and Competitive Context

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competitive reactions to new product introductions can be explained by observable characteristics related to the event, and by the interpretations of these factors by the defending competitors. A general model of competitive response is developed to explore the mediating role of interpretation factors between event characteristics and reaction decisions, and to study the contextual factors that moderate the relationship between event characteristics and interpretations. Results clearly demonstrate that if the interpretation factor is not taken into account researchers may overlook the influence of important variables explaining competitive reactions. Also, results indicate heterogeneity among managers regarding their interpretation of observable characteristics. Possible moderating factors are explored. The outcomes of this study are important both for new scientific insights in competitive reaction decision making, and for managers who act in the competitive arena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, J. Scott and Fred Collopy. (1996) “Competitor Orientation: Effects of Objectives and Information on Managerial Decisions and Profitability,” Journal of Marketing Research 33 (May), 188–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny. (1986) “The Moderator-Mediator variable Distinction in Social Psychological research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Gregory S. and Kent Nakamoto. (1990) “Competitive Strategies for Late Entry into a Market with a Dominant Brand,” Management Science, 36, 10, 1268–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Ming-Jer, Ken G. Smith and Curtis M. Grimm. (1992) “Action Characteristics as Predictors of Competitive Responses,” Management Science 38 (3), 439–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. Merle. (1997) New Products Management. 5th ed., Irwin, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, John R. and Steven M. Shugan. (1983) “Defensive Marketing Strategies,” Marketing Science 2 (Fall), 319–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil, Oliver P. and Rockney G. Walters. (1993) “Explaining Competitive Reactions to New Products: an Empirical Signaling Study,” Journal of Product Innovation Management 10, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, David W. and Stanley Lemeshow. (1989) Applied logistic regression. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porac, Joseph F., Howard Thomas, and Charles Baden-Fuller. (1989) “Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of the Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers,” Journal of Management Studies 26, 397–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, William T. (1988) “Marketing Mix Reactions to Entry,” Marketing Science 7 (Fall), 368–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and David Ross. (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Houghton Mifflin Cy, Boston.

  • Wittink, Dick R., Marco Vriens and Wim Burhenne. (1994) “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe: Results and Critical Reflections,” International Journal of Research in Marketing 11 (1), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waarts, E., Wierenga, B. Explaining Competitors' Reactions to New Product Introductions: The Roles of Event Characteristics, Managerial Interpretation, and Competitive Context. Marketing Letters 11, 67–79 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008102927459

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008102927459

Navigation