Skip to main content
Log in

Trade policy under imperfect competition: The economics of Russian roulette

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Neo-classical economic theory shows that managed trade or protectionism is (almost) always welfare decreasing. However, measurements of the welfare costs of protectionism based on neo-classical models seem to suggest that these costs are quite small. We discuss general new insights and developments in the theory, policy and empiricism of international trade. The observation that intra-industry trade and the services sector are important has led to a shift in theory away from constant returns to scale and perfect competition towards economies of scale and scope, externalities, market imperfections, and imperfect competition. Although this, in principle, opens the door to beneficial government intervention in the economic process, we emphasize that the true costs of protection can potentially be much higher than is generally acknowledged as a result of the above mentioned shift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balassa, B. (1986), ‘Intra-industry Specialization: A Cross-country Analysis,’European Economic Review, 30, pp. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1976), ‘Trade Creation and Diversion in the European Common Market: An Appraisal of the Evidence,’ in: H. Glejser (ed.),Quantitative Studies of International Economic Relations, Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeijk, P.A.G. van (1994),Economic Diplomacy, Trade and Commercial Policy, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeijk, P.A.G. van and C. van Marrewijk (1994), ‘Economic Sanctions: A Hidden Cost of the New World Order,’ in: M. Chatterji, H. Jager, and A. Rima (eds),The Economics of International Security, London, MacMillan, pp. 168–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (1993), ‘Fair Trade, Reciprocity, and Harmonization: The Novel Challenge to the Theory and Policy of Free Trade,’ in: D. Salvatore(ed.),Protectionism and World Welfare, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.P, E.E. Leamer and L. Sviekauskus (1987), ‘Multicountry, Multifactor Tests of the Factor Abundance Theory,’American Economic Review, 77, pp. 402–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakman, S. (1991),International Trade Flow Modeling: Decomposition Analyses, Groningen, Wolters Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakman, S. and C.J. Jepma (1995), ‘Protectionisme: politieke en economische aspecten,’ Financiële en Monetaire Studies, Groningen, Wolters Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J.A. (1995), ‘Strategic Trade Policy,’NBER Working Paper Series, No. 5020, Cambridge.

  • Brander, J.A. and B.J. Spencer (1985), ‘Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,’Journal of International Economics, 16, pp. 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and V Norman (1980),Theory of International Trade, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dujat (1995),Success in Japan, Sassenheim, pp. 66–69 (in Dutch).

  • Emerson, M., D. Gros, A. Italianer, J. Pisani-Ferry, H. Reichenbach (1992),One Market, One Money, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. (1982), ‘National and International Returns to Scale in the Modem Theory of International Trade,’American Economic Review, 72, pp. 389–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fase, M.M.G. (1985), ‘The Statistical Properties of Glejser's Measure of Intra-industry Trade Specialisation,’Journal of international Economics, 28, pp. 375–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fase, M.M.G. and C.C.A. Winder (1995), ‘Produktie, werkgelegenheid en loonontwikkeling in Nederland: toetsing van de wetten van Verdoorn en Baumol,’De Nederlandsche Bank/Kwartaalbericht: Overige berichten, September 1995, pp. 11–25.

  • Feenstra, R.C. (1995), ‘Estimating the Effects of Trade Policy,’NBER Working paper, No. 5051, Cambridge.

  • Greenaway, D. and D. Sapsford (1994), ‘What does Liberalization do for Exports and Growth,’Welt Wirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, pp. 152–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman (1991),Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H.G. and P.J. Lloyd (1975),Intra-industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products, New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H.G. and M. Walker (1989),Services Industry Growth., Vancouver, Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland, J.I. and VD. Norman (1992), ‘Global Production Effects of European Integration,’ in: L.A. Winters (ed.),Trade Flows and Trade Policy after ‘1992’, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.G. (1991), ‘Symposium- The Canada-U.S. FTA: Economic Impact and Transition Effects,’Journal of Policy Modelling, 13, pp. 421–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., J. Ries and D. Swenson (1995), ‘Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investments in the United States,’Journal of International Economics, 38, pp. 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1987), ‘Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries,’Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 1, pp. 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1985),Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1989),Trade Policy and Market Structure, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, B.M. (1993), ‘New Issues in the Uruguay Round and Beyond,’Economic Journal, 103, pp. 1528–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, J.R. (1971), ‘Effect on Prices of Japan's Entry into World Commerce after 1858, ’Journal of Political Economy, 79, pp. 614–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D. and J. Levinsohn (1993), ‘Monopolistic Competition and International Trade: Reconsidering the Evidence,’NBER Working Paper, No. 4389.

  • IMF (1994), ‘International Trade Policies: The Uruguay Round and Beyond,’ Volume I and II, WorldEconomic and Financial Surveys, Washington.

  • Kremer, P. (1993), ‘The O-ring Theory of Economic Development,’Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 551–575.

  • Krugman, P.R. (1979), ‘Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade,’Journal of International Economics, 9, pp. 469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, PR. (1980), ‘Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade,’American Economic Review, 70, pp. 950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1991), ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography,’Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1994), ‘Competitiveness; A Dangerous Obsession,’Foreign Affairs, March/April, pp. 28–44.

  • Krugman, P.R. (1993a), ‘Regionalism versus Multilateralism: Analytic Notes,’ in: J. de Melo and A. Panagariya (eds.),New Dimensions in Regional Integration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R., and R.Z. Lawrence (1993b), ‘Trade, Jobs and Wages,’ NBER Working Paper, No. 4478, Cambridge.

  • Leamer, E.E. (1984),Sources of International Comparative Advantage: Theory and Evidence, Cambridge, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E.E. (1994), ‘Testing Trade Theory,’ in: D. Greenaway and L.A. Winters (eds.),Surveys in International Trade, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E.E. (1995),The Heckscher-Ohlin Model in Theory and Practice, Princeton Studies in International Finance No. 77, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, S.P., W.A. Brock and L. Young (1989), ‘Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory: Political Economy in General Equilibrium,’ Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markheim, D. (1994), ‘A Note on Predicting the Trade Effects of Economic Integration and Other Preferential Trade Agreements: An Assessment,’Journal of Common Market Studies, 32, pp. 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. (1986), ‘Explaining the Volume of Trade: An Eclectic Approach,’American Economic Review, 76, pp. 1002–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. (1989), ‘Trade in Producer Services and in Other Specialized Intermediate Inputs,’American Economic Review, 79, pp. 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R., J.R. Melvin, W.H. Melvin, W.H. Kaempfer, and K.E. Maskus (1995),International Trade: Theory and Evidence, New York, McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrewijk, C. van, J. Stibora and A. de Vaal (1996), ‘Services Tradeability, Trade Liberalization, and Foreign Direct Investment,’forthcoming in Economica.

  • Miller, M.H. and J.E. Spencer (1977), ‘The Static Economic Effect of the UK Joining the EEC: A General Equilibrium Approach,’Review of Economic Studies, 44, pp. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Economische Zaken (1994),De GATT Uruguay Ronde: resultaten en gevolgen, Den Haag.

  • OECD (1992),Industrial Policy in OECD Countries, Annual Review 1992, Part 4, OECD, Paris, pp. 167–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993),Industrial Policy in OECD Countries, Annual Review 1993, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilat, D. (1993),The Economics of Catch-up: The Experience of Japan and South Korea, Dissertation, Groningen.

  • Richardson, J.D. (1988), ‘Empirical Research on Trade Liberalisation with Imperfect Competition: A Survey,’OECD Working Paper, No. 58.

  • Rivera-Batiz, L. and P. Romer (1991), ‘International Trade with Endogenous Technological Change,’European Economic Review, 35, pp. 971–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Batiz, L. and E Romer (1991b), ‘Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth,’Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, pp. 531–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P (1994), ‘New Goods, Old Theory, and the Welfare Costs of Trade Restrictions,’Journal of Development Economics, 43, pp. 5–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sach, J. and A. Warner (1995), ‘Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration,’Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, pp. 1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sazanami, Y., S. Urata and H. Kawai (1995),Measuring the Costs of Protection in Japan, Washington, Institute for International Economics.

  • Solow, R.M. (1994), ‘Perspectives on Growth Theory,’Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 4554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer B.J. and J.A. Brander (1983), ‘International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy,’Review of Economic Studies, 50, pp. 707–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1995), ‘European Business in Japan: A Policy Crossroads?,’Journal of Common Market Studies, 33, pp. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybout, J.R. (1993), ‘Internal Returns to Scale as a Source of Comparative Advantage: The Evidence,’American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 83, pp. 440–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (1993),World Investment Report, Geneva.

  • UNCTAD and World Bank (1994),Liberalizing International Transactions in Services, United Nations, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L.A. (1993), ‘The European Community: A Case of Successful Integration?,’ in: J. de Melo and A. Panagariya (eds.),New Dimensions in Regional Integration, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization (1995),Regionalism and the World Trading System, Geneva.

  • Zwet, A. van der (1995), Enige effecten van globalisering op de Nederlandse economic,DNB-MEB Serie, No. 1995–96, Amsterdam.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Brakman.

Additional information

We would like to thank, without implicating, Martin Fase, Harry Garretsen, Catrinus Jepma, Simon Kuipers, Ger Lanjouw, Tenn Schmidt, Albert de Vaal, and Jean-Marie Viaene for stimulating conversations and useful suggestions. We thank Thijs Knaap for excellent research assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brakman, S., Van Marrewijk, C. Trade policy under imperfect competition: The economics of Russian roulette. De Economist 144, 223–258 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681902

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01681902

Key words

Navigation