%PDF-1.4
%
1 0 obj
<>stream
iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT2020-09-29T12:12:54+05:30Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher2020-10-22T02:10:32-07:002020-10-22T02:10:32-07:00uuid:8addd02c-2a8d-4824-a074-0375b52bef83uuid:9735c38c-787b-4f5b-aca7-e8422204bc96JournalInternational Journal of Hyperthermia© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC3711131-11381131113810.1080/02656736.2020.1823022https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2020.1823022application/pdf10.1080/02656736.2020.1823022en-USHow large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devicesTaylor & FrancisInternational Journal of Hyperthermia, 2020. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1823022Trujillo MacarenaPrakash PunitFaridi PegahRadosevic AleksandarCurto SergioBurdio FernandoBerjano EnriqueMicrowave ablationmoderate hyperthermic heatingperiablational zoneradiofrequency ablationthermal ablationtumor ablationVoR2020-09-30truewww.tandfonline.com10.1080/02656736.2020.1823022www.tandfonline.comtrue2020-09-3010.1080/02656736.2020.1823022
endstream
endobj
4 0 obj
<>stream
xn,>_?r7r0|z8~HY^4_Bkaqz~?VC06.?~ahRb6&=-/?:|n-մkB5[廿[뛵
w/{;ekr]w\2k=DW"U.
^w'k9aj\oW-ћd1%[lbb* ʞ\OK*{5 s5Bɡ;CesMH$ܐ'"뤯aGo* F UqsG~vXyn%a04HbOKO#Xh+=kC#}昘NbYgV`6
Ot14
~Kl|H=Ȟt|BYsܳ2M#&QQG'$$ݮ]o,:_bQ'(D/lQL\jOκAv="O4
]ޭcۍ *ljn ~#y0P?Wd:D$fg-1p8'9_ *)bT6QEajot^{V̦ۛU#ѝbwl$BHB٪$H!iW!4%еh$7:+TmtA\E2bb'TAi}Du'VA2xt_'rV\+sA9'`'d6$6{ BۙطP2gy$v r{%l̹w$Toǵ:Ο'v`5| ^siES0䜫:GKԝ%Ia3