Skip to main content
Log in

On the calculation of the stability radiusof an optimal or an approximate schedule

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to stimulate interest in stability analysis for scheduling problems. In spite of impressive theoretical results in sequencing and scheduling, up to now the implementation of scheduling algorithms with a rather deep mathematical back-ground in production planning, scheduling and control, and in other real-life problems with sequencing aspects is limited. In classical scheduling theory, mainly deterministic systems are considered and the processing times of all operations are supposed to be given in advance. Such problems do not often arise in practice: Even if the processing times are known before applying a scheduling procedure, OR workers are forced to take into account the precision of equipment, which is used to calculate the processing times, round-off errors in the calculation of a schedule, errors within the practical realization of a schedule, machine breakdowns, additional jobs, and so on. This paper is devoted to the calculation of the stability radius of an optimal or an approximate schedule. We survey some recent results in this field and derive new results in order to make this approach more suitable for practical use. Computational results on the calculation of the stability radius for randomly generated job shop scheduling problems are presented. The extreme values of the stability radius are considered in more detail. The new results are amply illustrated with examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Bräsel, Yu.N. Sotskov and F. Werner, Stability of a schedule minimizing mean flow time, Math. Comput. Modelling 24(1996)39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M.J. Eisner and D.G. Severance, Mathematical techniques for efficient record segmentation in large shared databases, J. ACM 23(1976)619–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Girlich, Yu.N. Sotskov and F. Werner, Extreme values of the stability radius of an approximate solution of a linear Boolean minimization problem, Preprint 6 93, TU Magdeburg, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E.N. Gordeev and V.K. Leontev, The complexity of the tabulation of trajectory problems, U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 25, No.4(1985)199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E.N. Gordeev and V.K. Leontev, Stability in bottleneck problems, U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 20, No.4(1980)275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.Y. Kovalyov and Yu.N. Sotskov, The stability of an ε-approximate solution of a minimization problem of Boolean linear forms, Vesti Akad. Navuk BSSR, Ser. Fyz.-Mat. Navuk 2(1990)111–116 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.W.J. Kolen, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, C.P.M. van Hoesel and A.P.M. Wagelmans, Sensitivity analysis of list scheduling algorithms, Discrete Appl. Math. 55(1994)145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.A. Kravchenko, Yu.N. Sotskov and F. Werner, Optimal schedules with infinitely large stability radius, Optimization 33(1995)271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and D.B. Shmoys, Sequencing and scheduling: Algorithms and complexity, in: Logistics of Production and Inventory, Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science 4, eds. G.C. Graves, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan and P.H. Zipkin, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993, pp. 445–522.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V.K. Leontev, The stability of the Traveling Salesman Problem, U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 15, No.5(1975)199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V.K. Leontev, Stability in combinatorial choice problems, Soviet Math. Dokl. 17(1976)635–638.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Libura, Sensitivity analysis for minimum Hamiltonian path and Traveling Salesman Problems, Discrete Appl. Math. 30(1991)197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Libura, E.S. van der Poort, G. Sierksma and J.A.A. van der Veen, Sensitivity analysis based on k-best solutions of the Traveling Salesman Problem, Research Report 96A14, University of Groningen, The Netherlands, 1996, 27 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Pinedo, Scheduling, Theory, Algorithms, and Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Ramaswamy and N. Chakravarti, Complexity of determining exact tolerances for min-sum and min-max combinatorial optimization problems, Working Paper WPS-247/95, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, India, 1995, 34 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Roy and B. Sussmann, Problèmes d'ordonnancement avec contraints disjunctives, SEMA, Note DS, No. 9 bis Montrauge, 1964.

  17. Yu.N. Sotskov, The stability of high-speed optimal schedules, U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 29, No.3(1989)57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu.N. Sotskov, Stability of an optimal schedule, European J. Oper. Res. 55(1991)91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu.N. Sotskov, The stability of the approximate Boolean minimization of a linear form, Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 33, No.5(1993)699–707.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu.N. Sotskov, V.K. Leontev and E.N. Gordeev, Some concepts of stability analysis in combinatorial optimization, Discrete Appl. Math. 58(1995)169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu.N. Sotskov, N.Y. Sotskova and F. Werner, Stability of an optimal schedule in a job shop, OMEGA (1997), to appear.

  22. B. Sussmann, Scheduling problems with interval disjunctions, Z. Oper. Res. 16(1972)165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  23. V.S. Tanaev, Yu.N. Sotskov and V.A. Strusevich, Scheduling Theory, Multi-Stage Systems, Kluwer Academic, 1994.

  24. R.E. Tarjan, Sensitivity analysis of minimum spanning trees and shortest path trees, Inform. Processing Letters 14(1982)30–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C.P.M. van Hoesel and A.P.M. Wagelmans, On the complexity of postoptimality analysis of 0/1 programs, Report 9167 A, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1991, 18 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.E. Wendell, The tolerance approach to sensitivity analysis in linear programming, Management Sci. 31(1985)564–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sotskov, Y.N., Wagelmans, A.P. & Werner, F. On the calculation of the stability radiusof an optimal or an approximate schedule. Annals of Operations Research 83, 213–252 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018960030420

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018960030420

Keywords

Navigation