Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Managing Equality in Social Dilemmas: Emotional and Retributive Implications

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The equality rule is an important coordination rule in symmetric public good dilemmas. Although prior research emphasized that people use the equality rule out of efficiency concerns (as it helps to obtain the public good in the most efficient manner among group members), it may also reflect a true preference for fairness. More precisely, research examining emotional and retributive reactions as a result of a violation of the equality rule by a fellow group member showed that equality indeed is related to people’s personal values and what they consider to be fair. The present paper suggests that a violation of the equality rule results in emotional reactions, and these emotional experiences encourage further retributive actions. The different reactions following an equality violation are described as a function of three features: (1) the motives to use equality, (2) attributions for explaining the violation, and (3) the honesty of the given explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams J. S. (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz L. (eds), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. (Vol. 2:267–299). Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison S. T., McQueen L. R., Schaerfl L. M. (1992) Social decision making processes and the equal partitionment of shared resources. J. Exp. Social Psychol. 28:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison S. T., Messick D. M. (1990) Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. J. Behav. Decision Making 3:195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (1998). Nicomachean Ethics: Books VIII and IX (M. Pakaluk, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press

  • Bies R. J., Tripp T. M. (1996) Beyond distrust; “Getting even” and the need for revenge. In Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. (eds), Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research. (pp. 246–260). Sage Publications, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan S. F., De Waal F. B. M. (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsmith K. M., Darley J. M., Robinson P. H. (2002) Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. J. Personality Social Psychol. 83:284–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter J. P. (2003) Is fairness used instrumentally? Evidence from sequential bargaining. J. Economic Psychol. 24:467–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R., Ambrose M. L. (2001) Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In Greenberg J., Cropanzano R. (eds), Advances in Organizational Justice. (pp. 119–151) Stanford University Press, Stanford CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley J. M., Pittman T. S. (2003) The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality Social Psychol. Rev. 7:324–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes R. M. (1980) Social dilemmas. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 31:169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer D. (2002) The self-relevant implications of distribution rules: When self-esteem and acceptance are influenced by violations of the equity rule. Social Justice Res. 15:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer D., Snyder M., Dewitte S. (2001) The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)? The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European J. Social Psychol. 31:93–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M. (1975) Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?. J. Social Issues 31:37–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M. (1985) Distributive Justice. Yale University Press, New Haven/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney J. J. (1980) The commons problem: Alternative perspectives. Am. Psy. 35:131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eek D., Biel A., Gärling T. (2001) Cooperation in asymmetric social dilemmas when equality is perceived as unfair. J.Appl. Social Psychol. 31:649–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J. H., Lerner J. S., Tetlock P. E. (1999) Rage and reason: The psychology of the intuitive prosecutor. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 29:781–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans G. C. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D., (1739/1992). Treatise of Human Nature. Buffalo: Prometheus Books

  • Komorita S. S., Parks C. D. (1994) Social Dilemmas. Brown & Benchmark, Dubuque, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Konow J. (2003) Which is the fairest one of all?: A positive analysis of justice theories. J. Economic Literature 41:1188–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal G. S., Karuza J. Jr, Fry W. R. (1980) Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In Mikula (eds) ,Justice and Social Interaction. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind E. A. (1997). Litigation and claiming in organizations: Antisocial behavior or quest for justice?. In Giacalone R.A., Greenberg J. (eds.), Antisocial Behavior In Organizations. (pp. 150–171). Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G. F., Lerner J. S. (2002) The role of affect in decision making. In Davidson R. J., Scherer K. R., Goldsmith H. H. (eds), The Handbook of Affective Sciences. (pp. 619–642) University Press, Oxford, English

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein G. F., Thompson L., Bazerman M. H. (1989) Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J. Personality Social Psychol. 57:426–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce R. D., Raiffa H. (1957) Games and Decisions. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz M. A. (2001) On the norm of equality. Int. J. Social Econ. 28:782–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwell G., Ames R. E. (1979) Experiments on the provision of public goods, I: Resources, interest, group size, and the free-rider problem. Am. J. Sociol. 84:1335–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, D.M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In Mellers B.A., Baron J. (Eds), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications. Cambridge Series on Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US, pp. 11–31

  • Messick D. M. (1999a) Alternative logics for decision making in social settings. J. Economic Behav. Organ. 39:11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick D. M., Schell T. (1992) Evidence for an equality heuristic in social decision making. Acta Psychologica 80:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick D. M., Sentis K. P. (1983) Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In Messick D. M., Cook K. S. (eds), Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula G. (1980) On the role of justice in allocation decisions. In Mikula G. (eds), Justice and Social Interaction. (pp. 127–165) Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula G., Scherer K. R., Athenstaedt U. (1998) The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality Social Psychol. Bull. 24:769–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell G., Tetlock P. E., Mellers B. A., Ordóñez L. D. (1993) Judgments of social justice: Compromises between equality and efficiency. J. Personality Social Psychol. 65:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesse R. M. (1990) Evolutionary explanations of emotions. Human Nature 1:261–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The Am. Economic Rev. 83:1281–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971/1999). A theory of justice. Oxford: University Press

  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. (1994) Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Acad. Manage. Rev. 19:90–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseman I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion 5:161–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson E. E. (1975) On justice as equality. J. Social Issues 31:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T. C. (1980) The strategy of conflict. Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer K. R. (1999). Appraisal theory. In Dalgleish T., Power M.J. (eds), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. (pp. 637–663) John Wiley and Sons, Chichester

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver K. G. (1985) The attribution of blame; Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C. A., Ellsworth P. C. (1985) Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. J. Personality Social Psychol. 48:813–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith H. J. (2002) Thinking about deservingness. Social Justice Res. 15:409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouten J., De Cremer D., Van Dijk E. (2005a) All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation. Eur. J.Social Psychol. 35:767–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005b). (In)tolerance for equality violation: When violations of equality in social dilemmas affect contribution decisions. Manuscript submitted for publication

  • Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., and Van Dijk, E. (2006). Violating equality in social dilemmas: Emotional and retributive reactions as a function of trust, attribution, and sincerity. Personality and Social Psychol. Bull., 32, 894–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T. R., Belliveau M. A. (1995) Tradeoffs in justice principles: Definitions of fairness. In: Bunker B. B., Rubin J. Z. (Eds), Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch The Jossey Bass Management Series and the Jossey Bass Conflict Resolution Series. (pp. 291–314) Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco CA US

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T., Dawes R. M. (1993) Fairness in groups: Comparing the self-interest and social identity perspectives. In Mellers B., Baron J. (Eds), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications (pp. 87–108). Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk E., Wilke H. (1993) Differential interests, equity, and public good provision. J. Experimental Social Psychol. 29:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk E., Wilke H. (1995) Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: A comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas. J. Experimental Social Psychol. 31:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk E., Wilke H. (2000) Decision-induced focusing in social dilemmas: Give-some, keep-some, take-some, and leave-some dilemmas. J. Personality Social Psychol. 78:92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Lange P. A. M. (1999) The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. J. Personality Social Psychol. 77:337–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss H. M., Suckow K., Cropanzano R. (1999) Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. J. Appl. Psychol. 84:786–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen Stouten.

Additional information

The write-up of this paper was partly supported by GOA/05/04 from the Research Fund of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. The research and write-up was supported by a fellowship of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO, Grant No. 016.005.019), awarded to the second author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stouten, J., De Cremer, D. & van Dijk, E. Managing Equality in Social Dilemmas: Emotional and Retributive Implications. Soc Just Res 20, 53–67 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0032-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0032-1

Key Words

Navigation