Colon tumors and colonoscopy

L. Hol; M. E. van Leerdam

doi:10.1055/s-2008-1077570

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000012.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

Endoscopy 2008; 40(10): 843-848
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077570

DDW highlights

Colon tumors and colonoscopy

L. Hol¹ , M. E. van Leerdam¹

¹Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 September 2008 (online)

Also available at

Abstract
Full Text
References

Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Detection of CRC at an early stage improves the prognosis considerably. Furthermore, adenomas are the benign precursors of CRC, and removal of adenomas results in a lower than expected incidence of CRC. For these reasons, the detection and identification of colonic neoplasms was an important topic during the 2008 Digestive Disease Week (DDW).

References

1 Taber A, Romagnuolo J. Simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time increases polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB80-AB81

PubMed Google Scholar
2 Weiser K T, Butterly L F, Toor A. et al . Changing colonoscopy performance to meet the quality indicator of withdrawal time: results of a clinic-based improvement intervention. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB78

PubMed Google Scholar
3 Chan M Y, Cohen H, Spiegel B M. Does the first colonoscopy of the day yield more polyps than cases performed later?. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A37

PubMed Google Scholar
4 Zauber A G, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopy is the most likely screening strategy to offset escalating treatment costs. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A152

PubMed Google Scholar
5 Bokemeyer B, Rambow A, Hüppe D. et al . Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention– results from a German online registry on 269 000 cases. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A162

PubMed Google Scholar
6 Gellad Z F, Almirall D, Provenzale D. et al . Time from positive screening fecal occult blood test to colonoscopy and risk of neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A151

PubMed Google Scholar
7 Leung W K, Lau J Y, Suen B. et al . Colonoscopic screening at 5-year after initial examination in average risk subjects: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A88

PubMed Google Scholar
8 Martinez M E, Schatzkin A, Baron J A. et al . Advanced colorectal neoplasia following polypectomy: a pooled analysis. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A632

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
9 Robertson D J, Lieberman D A, Winawer S J. et al . Interval cancer after total colonoscopy: results from a pooled analysis of eight studies. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A111

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
10 Ho S B, Krinsky M L. Quality polyp resection in colonoscopy: are we achieving polyp clearance?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB79-AB80

PubMed Google Scholar
11 Gross S A, Buchner A M, Cangemi J R. et al . A prospective randomized back-to-back trial comparing narrow band imaging to conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A47

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
12 Adler A, Yenerim T, Aschenbeck J. et al . Narrow band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for screening colonoscopy in a private practice setting–a large prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB100-AB101

PubMed Google Scholar
13 Rogart J N, Siddiqui U D, Jain D. et al . Narrow band imaging without high magnification to differentiate polyps during real-time colonoscopy: improvement with experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB101

PubMed Google Scholar
14 Mayinger B, Neumann F, Kastner C L. et al . Early detection of pre-malignant conditions in the colon by fluorescence endoscopy using local sensitization with hexaminolevulinate (Hal). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB102

PubMed Google Scholar
15 Pellise M, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Cardenas A. et al . Clinical impact of wide-angle, high-resolution endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia in a non-selected population: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB101

PubMed Google Scholar
16 Waye J D, Heigh R I, Fleischer D E. et al . A prospective efficacy evaluation of the third eye retroscope auxiliary endoscopy system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB101-AB102

PubMed Google Scholar
17 Benson M E, Dureja P, Gopal D V. et al . A comparison of overall adenoma detection and recovery rate of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB89

PubMed Google Scholar
18 Rex D K, Overhiser A, Chen S. American College of Radiology (ACR) recommendations for CT colonography (CTC) interpretation: implications for resection of high risk adenoma findings. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB105-AB106

PubMed Google Scholar
19 Kessler W A, Klein R W, Wielage R C. et al . Cost savings of removing diminutive polyps without histologic assessment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB105

PubMed Google Scholar
20 Gellad Z F. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia on follow-up colonoscopy: results from VA Cooperative Study Program 380. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB80

PubMed Google Scholar
21 Lin O. The effect of periodic monitoring on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates and patient satisfaction scores. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB81

PubMed Google Scholar
22 Sinn D H. Documentation of withdrawal time improves adenoma detection during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB81

PubMed Google Scholar
23 Cury M S. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB304

PubMed Google Scholar
24 Benson M E. Factors that influence colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB294-AB295

PubMed Google Scholar
25 Francis G A. Time of day as a risk factor for incomplete colonoscopy: an Australian tertiary referral hospital experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB287

PubMed Google Scholar
26 El-Serag H B. Determinants and effect of lag time before colorectal cancer diagnosis. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A152

PubMed Google Scholar
27 Fisher D A. Time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the VA system. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A152

PubMed Google Scholar
28 Yen R. Ethnic differences in findings on screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A180

PubMed Google Scholar
29 Kerman D. A prospective study of the prevalence of colorectal adenomas in Hispanic immigrants referred for screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB313-AB314

PubMed Google Scholar
30 Weed M T. Medicaid patients with colorectal cancer are rarely diagnosed by screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A182

PubMed Google Scholar
31 Abdelsayed G. Who are we missing in colorectal cancer screening?. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A160

PubMed Google Scholar
32 Rathgaber S W. Repeat colonoscopy guideline adherence following screening and surveillance exams in a community gastroenterology practice?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB236-AB237

PubMed Google Scholar
33 Laiyemo A O. The continued follow up study of the Polyp Prevention Trial: a prospective study of utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A111

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
34 Leung K. The Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-Up Study (PPT-CFS): ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A114

PubMed Google Scholar
35 Krinsky M L. Dysplasia detection of colonic polyps and polypectomy sites using an Optical Biopsy™ system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB309

PubMed Google Scholar
36 Inoue T. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB302-AB303

PubMed Google Scholar
37 Suzuki H. Novel optical imaging techniques for diagnosis of colorectal adenoma–a prospective case study on detection of colorectal adenomas using AFI compared with NBI. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB185-AB186

PubMed Google Scholar
38 Wada Y. The diagnosis of colorectal lesions with magnifying narrow band imaging (NBI) system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB311-AB312

PubMed Google Scholar
39 Reese G E. Diagnostic Precision of narrow band imaging (NBI) versus chromoendoscopy for lesion characterization at colonoscopy: a meta analysis. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A192

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
40 Stipho S. The clinical utility of high definition magnification endoscopy with and without narrow band imaging for detection of colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB130

PubMed Google Scholar
41 Ko , BM . Comparison with narrow band imaging(NBI) magnification and histology finding in colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB126

PubMed Google Scholar
42 Patel K. The intra and inter observer variability of narrow band imaging to differentiate hyperplastic versus adenomatous polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB136

PubMed Google Scholar
43 Fukuzawa M. Can magnification narrow-band imaging (NBI) colonoscopy determine invasion depth of early colorectal cancer?–A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB122-AB123

PubMed Google Scholar
44 Hiraga Y. Clinical usefulness of NBI magnification in routine colonoscopic examination. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB136

PubMed Google Scholar
45 Sasajima K. Efficacy of narrow band imaging magnification for microvessel pattern of colorectal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB125

PubMed Google Scholar
46 Suzuki H. Novel optical imaging techniques for diagnosis of colorectal adenoma–a prospective case study on detection of colorectal adenomas using AFI compared with NBI. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB308-AB309

PubMed Google Scholar
47 Aihara H. Clinical significance of image-enhanced endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging (AFI) observations in differentiation between colonic neoplastic lesions and non-neoplastic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB309

PubMed Google Scholar
48 Haringsma J. Wide-angle colonoscopy significantly improves polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB310

PubMed Google Scholar
49 Randolph A C. Polyp detection rates do increase with the use of high definition, wide-angle colonoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB310

PubMed Google Scholar
50 Pohl J. A prospective randomized multicenter study on the Fujinon Intelligent Colour Enhancement (FICE) system versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: what is the impact of novel optical imaging techniques on polyp detection rates?. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB101

PubMed Google Scholar
51 Burgos H. Correlation of Fujinon FICE endoscopic imaging and histopathological findings in colorectal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB133

PubMed Google Scholar
52 Bianchi L K. High-definition endoscopy improves adenoma detection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB305-AB306

PubMed Google Scholar
53 Buchner A M. Does the use of high definition white light colonoscopy lead to higher adenoma detection rates compared to standard definition white light colonoscopy? An effectiveness study in 1225 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB130

PubMed Google Scholar
54 Hoffman A. High definition colonoscopy (HD +) with I-Scan function allows to recognize and characterize flat neoplastic changes as precisely as chromoendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67 AB125

PubMed Google Scholar
55 Kupfer A. Factors associated with advanced histology in small colonic polyps in a racially diverse population. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A183

PubMed Google Scholar
56 Chaves D M, Nakao F S, Sugai B M. et al . Prevalence of low and high grade diminutive adenomas in patients submitted to routine colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134 A186

PubMed Google Scholar

M. E. van LeerdamMD, PhD

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Erasmus MC University Medical Center

P.O. Box 2040
3000 CA, Rotterdam
The Netherlands

Fax: +31-10-7034682

Email: m.vanleerdam@erasmusmc.nl

>