Skip to main content
Log in

Nonuniform sampling of urodynamic signals: a comparison of different methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several different techniques for urodynamic signal compression have been proposed in the last few years. Using these techniques it is possible to reduce the requirements for digital storage or transmission. There are a number of applications where it is essential to use such techniques in diagnostic and ambulatory urodynamics. The purpose of this study is to compare different techniques of urodynamic data compression. the so-called FAN, voltage triggered, two point projection and second difference methods. The comparison between the methods is based on 65 pressure, 46 uroflow and 18 surface electromyogram signals. The reduction ratio achieved for different allowable errors between the original and compressed signals is calculated and compared for the different techniques. Results show that it is possible to store urodynamic signals accurately at a low sampling rate, where FAN and voltage triggered methods seem to be superior to the rest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aminian K, Ruffieux C, Robert P (1988) Filtering by adaptive sampling (FAS). Med Biol Eng Comput 26:658

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bohs LN, Barr RC (1988) Real-time adaptive sampling with the fan algorithm. Med Biol Eng Comput 26:565

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen A (1986) Biomedical signal processing, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gardenhire LW (1965) Data redundancy reduction for biomedical telemetry. In: Caceres C (ed) Biomedical telemetry, vol 11. Academic Press, New York, p 255

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jalaleddine SM, Hutchens CG, Strattan RD, Coberly WA (1990) ECG data compression techniques: a unified approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37:329

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mastrigt R van, Griffiths DJ (1989) Efficient storage of urodynamic signals by computer: application of FAN adaptive sampling. Urol Res 17:57

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rowan D, James D, Kramer EJL, Sterling AM, Suhel P (1987) Urodynamic equipment: technical aspects. Med Eng Technol 11(2):57

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kocjan, T., van Mastrigt, R. Nonuniform sampling of urodynamic signals: a comparison of different methods. Urol. Res. 22, 137–141 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571839

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571839

Key words

Navigation