An inventory model with dependent product demands and returns

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00080-3Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper an inventory model for a single reusable product is investigated, in which the random returns depend explicitly on the demand stream. Further, the model distinguishes itself from most other research in this field by considering leadtimes and a finite planning horizon. We show that neglecting the dependency between demands and returns of products may lead to bad performance with respect to total average relevant costs. Additionally, our results enable us to determine the minimal recovery probability or the minimal length of the planning horizon for which reuse is profitable.

Introduction

A number of papers have studied inventory policies under consideration of random returns (see [1] for an overview), but most of these assume that the return process is independent of the demand process (see e.g. [2]). This type of modeling may be good for situations in which no information about a dependence structure is available or situations with many different sources for the returns. But there are also situations in which a model with a dependence structure between the demands and the returns seems to fit better. We have such situations in the case of rented or leased products, or if delivered items are returned to the original manufacturer only. We can also think about packaging and transportation materials.

In this paper we develop and investigate an inventory model for a single, reusable product in which the random returns depend explicitly on the demand stream. A similar situation is also discussed in [3], but without considering backorders. Additionally, they do not consider the leadtime for purchasing. Also Yuan and Cheung [4] consider a model with dependent returns, but without a purchasing leadtime. We relax this assumption and allow a positive purchasing leadtime.

Silver and Kelle [5] determine an optimal purchasing policy for reusable containers by transferring the stochastic model in a deterministic one. We use a Markov-chain approach in order to determine the optimal order-up-to policy with respect to total average relevant cost.

Although in many papers the long-term behavior of the inventory is investigated (see e.g. [6]) we consider a finite planning horizon. The reason for this is that nowadays, the life-cycle of products is getting shorter and shorter, because of fast changing trends and new developments. This can be observed, in particular, for electronic products. Therefore, inventory models for short-term control have to be investigated and preferably objective functions should be used where no steady-state assumptions are necessary.

In this paper we show that there is a great difference between a situation with independent demands and returns and a situation, where the returns depend on the demand. Therefore, neglecting the dependency of the returns on demands may lead to poor policy performance. We show how to compute the optimal order-up-to level for a situation with dependent returns. In such a situation the optimal inventory level is less than in the other case and the average relevant costs can be reduced by using the information about the dependence structure. The influence of the return probability and the length of the planning horizon on policy performance is investigated. Additionally, we compare a system with product returns with a system without product returns. Our results enable to answer questions regarding the profitability of product reuse in relation with return probability and time-in-market.

The paper is further organized as follows. In Section 2 we start with a detailed description of the model and its underlying assumptions. In Section 3 we develop an approximation to the total average costs, which we use as the objective function, followed by a numerical study (Section 4). Finally, we summarize our results and conclusions and give an outlook for further research.

Section snippets

Model definition and assumptions

We consider a single, reusable product. Because of fast changing trends in the market, this product is planned to be produced only for a limited planning horizon T which is the same as the time in market. Practical limitations are the reason for reviewing the inventory only periodically. We assume, that the length of one period is known and constant. Without loss of generality, we take the length of a period equal to one, and the periods are numbered by t=1,2,…,T.

We assume that the demands per

Determination of the objective function

In order to determine the average relevant costs in one period we first introduce the inventory position It and illustrate the differences between the dependent and the independent case. Then we are able to determine the optimization problem.

Numerical study

Before we discuss the influence of the recovery probability and the length of the planning horizon on the economic profitability of product reuse (Section 4.2), we first compare the case of dependent returns with the case of independent returns. In our numerical examples we limit ourselves on constant demand and return rates since the focus of our investigations are effects resulting from the dependency and not from dynamic demand and return patterns. The following base case scenario for the

Summary, conclusions and outlook

In this paper we have developed a periodic review inventory system with product returns that depend explicitly on the demand stream. The system, which includes leadtimes and a finite planning horizon, is controlled by a fill-up policy. We showed how both the optimal policy and the minimal average total relevant cost depend on the recovery probability. Also we indicated the influence of the planning horizon on the minimal total average costs. The influence of the planning horizon on the optimal

References (7)

  • M. Fleischmann et al.

    Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (1997)
  • K. Inderfurth

    Simple optimal replenishment and disposal policies for a product recovery system with leadtimes

    OR Spektrum

    (1997)
  • M.A. Cohen et al.

    A dynamic inventory system with recycling

    Naval Research Logistics Quarterly

    (1980)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (116)

  • Modelling the influence of returns for an omni-channel retailer

    2023, European Journal of Operational Research
  • Single item periodic review inventory control with sales dependent stochastic return flows

    2023, International Journal of Production Economics
    Citation Excerpt :

    The finite horizon model coupled with a detailed terminal period cost structure, as compared to zero terminal cost assumption used in papers reviewed in Table 2, is another unique feature of this paper. Under these distinct and realistic elements of our model, we quantify the value of incorporating returns in inventory management as in Kelle and Silver (1989), Buchanan and Abad (1998), and Benedito and Corominas (2013), which is increasing in the return rate (Kiesmüller and Van der Laan, 2001; Zerhouni et al., 2013). First, return-smart retailers should reconsider their inventory replenishment decisions by incorporating return flows.

View all citing articles on Scopus

The research presented in this paper makes up part of the research on reuse in the context of the TMR project REVersed LOGistics financially supported by the European Union (ERB 4061 PL 97-650) in which apart from Eindhoven University of Technology take part the Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), the Aristoteles University of Thessaloniki (GR), INSEAD (F), the Otto-von-Guericke-Universitaet Magdeburg (D) and the University of Piraeus (GR). The second author greatly acknowledges the financial support provided by the NWO.

View full text