Skip to main content
Log in

Misunderstandings concerning income distribution policies

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this essay in honour of Professor P. Hennipman the latter's clarity and precision of expression are chosen as an example of how to avoid misunderstanding of his publications. As counterexamples some twenty-odd misunderstandings are set out by the essay's author in the field of income distribution policies, ranging from that specific subject to the theory of economic policy, to economic science and to science as a whole. Several of these misunderstandings are due to the essay's author, while others seem to prevail either among the general public or among scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouma, N., B.M.S. van Praag and J. Tinbergen, “Testing and Applying a Theory of Utility,”European Economic Review, VIII (1976), pp. 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, J.A., P. Nijkamp and J. Spronk, “Operational Multiple Goal Models for Large Economic Environmental Systems,” paper presented at the 9th IFIP Conference on Optimization Techniques, Warszawa (mimeographed, Erasmus University, Rotterdam), September 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R.H., “Tinbergen's Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies - A Review Article,”Journal of Human Resources, XII (1977), pp. 103–114. Also published in the Dutch journalDe Economist CXXV, pp. 161–173, and as Reprint 232 in the Reprint Series of the Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin at Madison; WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmers, F.L.C.H.,Project Planning and Income Distribution, Boston/The Hague/London, 1979.

  • Hennipman, P.,Welvaartstheorie en economische politiek, published under the editorship of J. van den Doel and A. Heertje, Alphen aan den Rijn/Brussel, 1977.

  • Huppes, T.,Inkomensverdeling en institutionele structuur, Leiden, 1977.

  • Kuipers, S.K.et al, “Een 1ibemle visie op de verdeling van inkomen en verwogen,” Geschrift ven de Prof. Mr. B.M. Teldersstichting, 34, Den Haag, 1979.

  • Leduc, G., discussion de la conférence de C. Morrisson,Revue des Travaux de l Académie des sciences morales et politiques et Comptes Rendus de ses séances (2e sémestre) 130e année, 4e série, Paris, Librairie d'Argences (1977), p. 492.

  • Levy, S. and L. Guttman, “On the Multivariate Structure of Well-being,”Social Indicators Research 2, 1975, pp. 361–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisson, C., “Structures politiques et répartition des revenus,”Revue des travaux de l' Académie des sciences morales et politiques et Comptes Rendus de ses Séances, 2e sémestre, 130e année, 4e série, Paris Librairie d'Argences, 1977, pp. 473–485.

  • Myrdal, G.,Vetenskap och politik i nationalekonomin, Stockholm, (revised edition: 1972, Stockholm), 1930.

  • Neuman, J. v. and O. Morgenstern,Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton, 1944.

  • Pen, J. and J. Tinbergen,Naar een rechtvaardiger inkomensverdeling, Amsterdam/Brussels, 1977.

  • Pen, J., “The Role of Power in the Distribution of Personal Income: Some Illustrative Numbers,” in: W. Krelle and A.F. Shorrocks (eds.),Personal Income Distribution, Amsterdam/New York/Oxford, 1978.

  • Pen, J.,Kijk economie, Utrecht/Antwerpen, 1979.

  • Peter, H., “Wandlungen in der Wirtschaftsauffassung”,Finanzarchiv, 1949, p. 194.

  • Praag, B.M.S. van, “The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation,”Review (1971), p. 377ff.

  • Pütz, T. and G. Neuhauser, “Einige Bemerkungen zum Begriff der rationalen Wirtschafspolitik,” in: E. Küng (Hrsg.)Wandlungen in Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Festschrift für W.A. Jöhr, Tübingen, 1980, pp. 487–507, in particular p. 499.

  • Rawls, J., ATheory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass. 1971.

  • Ritzen, J.M.M.,Education, Economic Growth and Income Distribution, Amsterdam, 1977.

  • Tinbergen, J.,Econometric, Gorinchem, 1941.

  • Tinbergen, J.,Economic Policy: Principles and Design, Amsterdam, 1956.

  • Tinbergen, J.,Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies, Amsterdam, 1975.

  • Tinbergen, J.,Income Differences: Recent Research, Amsterdam, 1975a.

  • Tinbergen, J., “Some Remarks on the Optimal Tax System,” in Van Bochove, C.A., Van Eijket al. (eds.),Modelling for Government and Business, Essays in Honor of P.J. Verdoorn, Leiden, 1977, pp. 165–175.

  • Tinbergen, J., “Equitable Distribution: Definition, Measurement, Feasibility,” in: W. Krelle and A.F. Shorrocks (eds.),Personal Income Distribution, Amsterdam/New York/Oxford, 1978, pp. 35–50.

  • Tinbergen, J., “Recollections of Professional Experiences,”Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, No. 131, December (1979), pp. 331–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. (1980), “Optimal Education, Occupation and Income Distribution in a Simplist Model NL 62,” in: S. Rosenfielde (ed.), forthcoming.

  • Vos, H.M., “Ook vrijheid moet eerhjk worden verdeeld,”NRC Handelsblad, February, 1980.

  • Wheeler, LA., “Memoir,” in French, A.P. (ed.),Einstein, A Centenary Volume, London, 1979, p. 21.

  • Wolfson, D.J. (1979), “Zin en Onzin van het tertiaire inkomensbegrip,” in: N.C.M. van Niekerk (ed.),Tertiaire Inkomensverdeling, Instituut voor Onderzoek van Overheidsuitgaven, Den Haag/Deventer, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tinbergen, J. Misunderstandings concerning income distribution policies. De Economist 129, 8–20 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705865

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705865

Keywords

Navigation