Abstract
Many neighbourhoods in the Netherlands have reached the stage of colliding subcultures, and interpersonal conflict. The young live next to the old, the rich next to the poor, single people next to families, the white next to the brown and the black, the established next to the outsiders. In some places, this social-cultural abundance leads to fear, uncertainty, and irritation. Not everybody is as understanding and tolerant of diverse lifestyles and thinking patterns as another person is. In places, this diversity leads to new behaviour patterns and institutions. Multi-ethnic community boards are starting to function as mediatory panels for settling disputes between neighbours and neighbourhood residents. In this article we claim that community mediation - a form of alternative dispute resolution designed to resolve interpersonal conflict in the neighbourhood - is both an attempt to rejuvenate the idea of community and a new way to settle differences and interpersonal conflicts between neighbours in the Netherlands. One might even argue that the neighbourhood is a level too high for social intervention and that instead one should focus on a lower level in the lifeworld: the house, the block, or at most, the street.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adriaansens, H.P.M. and A.C. Zijderveld, Vrijwillig initiatief en verzorgingsstaat: Cultuursociologische analyse van een beleidsprobleem. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus, 1981.
Aubert, V., Competition and dissensus: Two types of conflict and of conflict resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution (7), pp. 26–42, 1963.
Baruch Bush, R.A. and J. Folger, The Promise of Mediation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1994.
Berger, P.L. and T. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1967.
Blad, J.R., Neighbourhood-centered conflict mediation: The San Francisco example. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 4(1), pp. 90–107, 1996.
Boutellier, H., Recht op de buurt: Experimenten met Huizen van Justitie. Tijdschrift voor de sociale sector, 12, pp. 4–8, 1996.
Christie, N., Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), pp. 1–10, 1977.
Elias, N. and J.L. Scotson, The Established and the Outsiders: A Sociological Enquiry into Community Problems. London: Cass, 1965.
Ellickson, R.C., Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, 1991.
Erikson, K., A New Species of Trouble: The Human Experience of Modern Disasters. New York: Norton, 1995.
Esping-Andersen, G., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
Gemeente Amsterdam, De kracht van een diverse stad: Plan van aanpak diversiteitsbeleid van de Gemeente Amsterdam (Concept). Amsterdam: Gemeente Amsterdam, 1999.
Goris, P., Justitiële antenneposten in kwetsbare wijken: Gesitueerd en geëvalueerd vanuit Braithwaite's theoretische concepten. Tijdschrift voor criminologie, 38(4), pp. 382–392, 1996.
Gusfield, J.R., Constructing the ownership of social problems: Fun and profit in the welfare state. Social Problems, 36(5), pp. 431–441, 1989.
Habermas, J., The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume Two. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.
Hortulanus, R.P., Stadsbuurten: Bewoners en beheerders in buurten met uiteenlopende reputaties. Utrecht, 1995.
Lofland, L.H., Private lifestyles, changing neighbourhoods, and public life. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 80(2), pp. 89–96, 1989.
Mackie, K., D. Miles and W. Marsh, Commercial Dispute Resolution: An ADR Practice Guide. London: Butterworths, 1995.
Merry, S.E., The social organization of mediation in non-industrial societies: Implications for informal community justice in America. In R. Abel (Ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, pp. 17–45. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
Merry, S.E., Alternative Dispute Resolution and Social Justice: The United States' Experience, 1997. Available: http://www.vuw.ac.nz/nzidr/merry1.htm [Accessed 17 August 1998], 1997.
Merry, S.E. and N. Milner (Eds), The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.
Peper, B., F. Spierings, W. de Jong, S. Hogenhuis, J. Blad and V. van Altena, Bemiddelen bij conflicten tussen buren: Een sociaal-wetenschappelijke evaluatie van experimenten met buurtbemiddeling in Nederland. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit, 1999.
Schutz, A., Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, 2nd ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967.
Shonholtz, R., Justice from another perspective: The ideology and developmental history of the community. In S.E. Merry and N. Milner (Eds), The Possibility of Popular Justice: A Case Study of Community Mediation, pp. 201–238. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.
Spierings, F., Dak-en thuislozen in Rotterdam: Hulpverlening en overlastbestrijding. Justitiële verkenningen, 24(1), pp. 82–92, 1998a.
Spierings, F., New ways to help those who will not help themselves. Professional Social Work, July, pp. 10–11, 1998b.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peper, B., Spierings, F. Settling Disputes between Neighbours in the Lifeworld: An Evaluation of Experiments with Community Mediation in the Netherlands. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 7, 483–507 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008798122935
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008798122935