Skip to main content
Log in

Firm Survival in the Netherlands

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the dynamics of industrial organization differ in the Netherlands from what has emerged as a Stylized Fact in other countries. Because the Netherlands has pursued a unique set of institutions and policies comprising what has become known as the Polder Model, the factors leading to firm failure may systematically differ from those in other countries. We address this question using a longitudinal database from Statistics Netherlands (CBS) that identifies over two thousand firms in manufacturing and then tracks their performance over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrighetti, A. (1994) 'Entry, Growth and Survival of Manufacturing Firms', Small Business Economics, 6, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1991) 'New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime', Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., and T. Mahmood (1995) 'New-Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function', Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., and J. Mata (1995) 'The Post-Entry Performance of Firms: Introduction', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 413–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., B. Menkveld, and A.R. Thurik (1996) 'The Decision between Internal and External R&D', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152, 510–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bais, J., and F. W. van Uxem (1996) Groei van het Aantal Bedrijfsvestigingen in Nederland 1994. Zoetermeer: EIM Small Business and Consultancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. R., and P. K. Gorecki (1991) 'FirmEntry and Exit in the Canadian Manufacturing Sector', Canadian Journal of Economics, 24, 300–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E., and M. E. Porter (1976) 'Barriers to Exit', in R. T. Masson and P. D. Qualls, eds., Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., M. J. Roberts, and L. Samuelson (1988) 'Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries', Rand Journal of Economics, 104, 671–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. (1995) 'What Do We Know about Entry?', International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., and J. Freeman (1989) Organizational Ecology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauw, P. A. van der, A. F. M. Nijssen, and C. J. van Uitert (1996) Werken en Werkgelegenheid in het MKB. Zoetermeer: EIM Small Business and Consultancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Louis (1985) Analysis of the Accuracy of SBA's Small Business Database. Alexandria, VA: Center of Naval Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1986) 'The Agency Costs of Free Cash Flows, Corporate Finance and Takeovers', American Economic Review, 75, 234–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. (1982) 'Selection and Evolution in Industry', Econometrica, 50, 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1998) 'Is Labour Market Performance Harmful to Innovation?', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind van Wijngaarden, K. I. de (1996) The State of Small Business in the Netherlands. Zoetermeer: EIM Small Business and Consultancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, James (1985) 'Dun & Bradstreet Business Microdata: Research Applications, and the Detection and Correction of Errors', Journal of Economic and SocialMeasurement, 13, 173–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. (1962) 'Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms', American Economic Review, 52, 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. (1994) 'Firm Growth During Infancy', Small Business Economics, 6, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute (1997) Boosting Dutch Economic Performance. Amsterdam: McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1994) 'Innovation and Diffusion in Small Firms: Theory and Evidence', Small Business Economics, 6, 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1973) 'The Determinants of Plant Size in Six Nations', Review of Statistics and Economics, 55, 135–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (1994) 'The Post-Entry Performance of New Small Firms in German Manufacturing Industries', Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. W. (1976) 'Optimal Plant Scale and the Extent of Suboptimal Capacity', in R. T. Masson and P. D. Qualls, eds., Essays on Industrial Organization in Honor of Joe S. Bain. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L. W. (1979) 'The Structure-Conduct-Performance Paradigm and Antitrust: the Goals of Competitive Policy', University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127, 1104–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, L.W. (1991) in D. B. Audretsch and H. Yamawaki, eds., Structure, Conduct and Performance. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennekers, S. (1997) 'The Revival of Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands', Paper presented at The EIIW Conference on Business Start-Ups and SME Policy in Europe, Potsdam 13–14 March.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Audretsch, D.B., Houweling, P. & Thurik, A.R. Firm Survival in the Netherlands. Review of Industrial Organization 16, 1–11 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007824501527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007824501527

Navigation