skip to main content
10.1145/1454008.1454040acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Choosing attribute weights for item dissimilarity using clikstream data with an application to a product catalog map

Published:23 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In content- and knowledge-based recommender systems often a measure of (dis)similarity between items is used. Frequently, this measure is based on the attributes of the items. However, which attributes are important for the users of the system remains an important question to answer. In this paper, we present an approach to determine attribute weights in a dissimilarity measure using clickstream data of an e-commerce website. Counted is how many times products are sold and based on this a Poisson regression model is estimated. Estimates of this model are then used to determine the attribute weights in the dissimilarity measure. We show an application of this approach on a product catalog of MP3 players provided by Compare Group, owner of the Dutch price comparison site http://www.vergelijk.nl, and show how the dissimilarity measure can be used to improve 2D product catalog visualizations.

References

  1. B. Arslan, F. Ricci, N. Mirzadeh, and A. Venturini. A dynamic approach to feature weighting. Manage. Inform. Syst., 6:999--1008, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. Borg and P. J. F. Groenen. Modern Multidimensional Scaling. Springer, New York, 2nd edition, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. K. Branting. Learning feature weights from customer return-set selections. Knowl. Inf. Syst., 6:188--202, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Burke. Knowledge based recommender systems. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, volume 69, Supplement 32. Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Chaudhuri, W.-D. Lo, W.-Y. Loh, and C.-C. Yang. Generalized regression trees. Stat. Sin., 5:641--666, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Ciampi. Generalized regression trees. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 12:57--78, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Coyle and P. Cunningham. Improving recommendation rankings by learning personal feature weights. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3155:560--572, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. Debnath, N. Ganguly, and P. Mitra. Feature weighting in content based recommendation system using social network analysis. In Proceeding of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1041--1042, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. C. Gower. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27:857--874, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. B. F. Green. The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 17:429--440, 1952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. J. Honaker, G. King, and M. Blackwell. Amelia II: A Program for Missing Data, 2008. R package version 1.1--27, http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. G. Ibrahim, M.-H. Chen, S. R. Lipsitz, and A. H. Herring. Missing-data methods for generalized linear models: A comparative review. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 100(469):332--346, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Jameson, R. Schäfer, J. Simons, and T. Weis. Adaptive provision of evaluation-oriented information: Tasks and techniques. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1886--1893, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Kagie, M. Van Wezel, and P. J. F. Groenen. Online shopping using a two dimensional product map. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 4655:89--98, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Kagie, M. Van Wezel, and P. J. F. Groenen. A graphical shopping interface based on product attributes. Decis. Support Syst., 2008. http://dx.doi.org/j.dss.2008.06.011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. King, J. Honaker, A. Joseph, and K. Scheve. Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 95(1):49--69, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. F. Lorenzi and F. Ricci. Case-based recommender systems: A unifying view. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3169:89--113, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. McCullagh and J. A. Nelder. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton, 2nd edition, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. McSherry. A generalised approach to similarity-based retrieval in recommender systems. Artif. Intell. Rev., 18:309--341, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. A. Nelder and R. W. M. Wedderburn. Generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A-Stat. Soc., 135(3):370--384, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2008. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. B. Rubin. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley, New York, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. L. Schafer and M. K. Olsen. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behav. Res., 33(4):545--571, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. I. Schwab, W. Pohl, and I. Koychev. Learning to recommend from positive evidence. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 241--246, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Verbeek. A Guide To Modern Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2nd edition, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D. Wettschereck and D. W. Aha. Weighting features. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1010:347--358, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Choosing attribute weights for item dissimilarity using clikstream data with an application to a product catalog map

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                RecSys '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems
                October 2008
                348 pages
                ISBN:9781605580937
                DOI:10.1145/1454008

                Copyright © 2008 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 23 October 2008

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • poster

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

                Upcoming Conference

                RecSys '24
                18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
                October 14 - 18, 2024
                Bari , Italy

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader