Abstract
Objective
Patients with severe mental illness who are treated in assertive community treatment (ACT) teams are sometimes involuntarily admitted when they are dangerous to themselves or others, and are not motivated for treatment. However, the consequences of involuntary admission in terms of psychosocial outcome and treatment motivation are largely unknown. We hypothesized that involuntary admission would improve psychosocial outcome and not adversely affect their treatment motivation.
Methods
In the context of routine 6-monthly outcome monitoring in the period January 2003–March 2008, we used the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) and a motivation-for-treatment scale to assess 260 severely mentally ill patients at risk for involuntary admission. Mixed models with repeated measures were used for data analyses.
Results
During the observation period, 77 patients (30%) were involuntarily admitted. Relative to patients who were not involuntarily admitted, these patients improved significantly in HoNOS total scores (F = 17,815, df = 1, p < 0.001) and in motivation for treatment (F = 28.139, df = 1, p < 0.001). Patients who were not involuntarily admitted had better HoNOS and motivation scores at baseline, but did not improve.
Conclusions
Involuntary admission in the context of ACT was associated with improvements in psychosocial outcome and motivation for treatment. There are no indications that involuntary admission leads to deterioration in psychosocial outcome or worsening of motivation for treatment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burns T, Catty J, Wright C (2006) Deconstructing home-based care for mental illness: can one identify the effective ingredients? Acta Psychiatr Scand 113(Suppl 429):33
Craw J, Compton MT (2006) Characteristics associated with involuntary versus voluntary legal status at admission and discharge among psychiatric inpatients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41(12):981–988
Fiander M, Burns T, McHugo GJ, Drake RE (2003) Assertive community treatment across the Atlantic: a comparison of model fidelity in the UK and USA. Br J Psychiatry 182:248–254
Gardner W, Lidz CW, Hoge SK, Monahan J, Eisenberg MM, Bennett NS, Mulvey EP, Roth LH (1999) Patients’ revisions of their beliefs about the need for hospitalisation. Am J Psychiatry 156:1385–1391
Kallert TW, Glöckner M, Schützwohl M (2007) Involuntary vs voluntary hospital admission: a systematic literature review on outcome diversity. Eur Archiv Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 258:195–205
Kaltiala-Heino R, Laippala P, Salokangas RKR (1997) Impact of coercion on treatment outcome. Int J Law Psychiatry 20:311–322
Katsakou C, Priebe S (2006) Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 114:232–241
Keski-Valkama A, Sailas E, Eronen M, Koivisto AM, Lönnqvist J, Kaltiala-Heino R (2007) A 15-year national follow-up: legislation is not enough to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42(9):747–752
Lorant V, Depuydt C, Gillain B, Guillet A, Dubois V (2007) Involuntary commitment in psychiatric care: what drives the decision? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 42(5):360–365
Lyons JS (1998) The severity and acuity of psychiatric illness scales. An outcomes management and decision support system. Adult version. Manual. The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company, San Antonio
Mintz AR, Dobson KS, Romney DM (2003) Insight in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 61:75–88
Monahan J, Hoge SK, Lidz C, Roth LH, Bennett N, Gardner W, Mulvey E (1995) Coercion and commitment: understanding involuntary mental hospital admission. Int J Law Psychiatry 18:249–263
Mulder CL, Koopmans GT, Hengeveld MW (2005) Lack of motivation for treatment in emergency psychiatric patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 40:484–488
Mulder CL, Staring ABP, Loos J, Buwalda VJA, Kuijpers D, Sytema S, Wierdsma AI (2004) De Health of the Nations Outcome Scales in Nederlandse vertaling. Psychometrische kenmerken. (The HoNOS in Dutch translation; Psychometrics). Dutch J Psychiatry 46:273–285
Parabiaghi A, Barbato A, D’Avanzo B, Erlicher A, Lora A (2005) Assessing reliable and clinically significant change on Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: method for displaying longitudinal data. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 39:719–725
Priebe S, Watts J, Chase M, Matanov A (2005) Processes of disengagement and engagement in assertive outreach patients; qualitative study. Br J Psychiatry 187:438–443
Rain SD, Williams VF, Robbins PC, Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Vesselinov R (2003) Perceived coercion at hospital admission and adherence to mental health treatment after discharge. Psychiatr Serv 54:103–105
Sellwood W, Tarrier N (1994) Demographic factors associated with extreme non-compliance in schizophrenia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 29(4):172–177
Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Hannon MJ (2003) Does fear of coercion keep people away from mental health treatment? Evidence from a survey of persons with schizophrenia and mental health professionals. Behav Sci Law 21:459–472
Tait L, Birchwood M, Trower P (2002) A new scale (SES) to measure engagement with community mental health services. J Ment Health 11:191–198
Wallsten T, Kjellin L, Lindström L (2006) Short-term outcome of inpatient psychiatric care—impact of coercion and treatment characteristics. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41(12):975–980
Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS); research and development. Br J Psychiatry 172:11–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kortrijk, H.E., Staring, A.B.P., van Baars, A.W.B. et al. Involuntary admission may support treatment outcome and motivation in patients receiving assertive community treatment. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 45, 245–252 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0061-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0061-1