Abstract
Clinical rotations play an important role in the medical curriculum and are considered crucial for student learning. However, competencies that should be learned can differ from those that are assessed. In order to explore which competencies are considered important for daily performance of student on the wards and to what extent clinical teachers consider the same competencies important for clerkship grading, a survey that consisted of 21 different student characteristics was administered to clinical teachers. Two independent factor analyses using structural equation modeling were conducted to abstract underlying latent relationships among the different student characteristics and to define a clinical competence profile for daily performance of students on the wards and clerkship grading. Differences between the degree of importance for student daily ward performance and clerkship grading are considered and discussed. The results of the survey indicate that the degree of importance of competencies are rated different for daily performance of students on the wards and clerkship grades. Competencies related to the diagnostic process are more important for clerkship grading, whereas interpersonal skills, professional qualities, and motivation are more important for daily ward performance. It is concluded that the components of clinical competence considered important for adequate performance are not necessarily in alignment with what is required for grading. Future research should focus on an explanation why clinical educators think differently about the importance of competencies for student examination in contrast to what is required for adequate daily performance on the wards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABIM. (1979). American board of internal medicine: Clinical competence in internal medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 90, 402–411.
ABIM. (2001). Evaluating your clinical competence: New competencies for internal medicine. Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine.
ABIM. (2002). Residents: Evaluating your clinical competence. New competencies for internal medicine. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: American Board of Internal Medicine Clinical Competence Program.
Anderson, M. B., Cohen, J. J., Hallock, J. E., Kassebaum, D. G., Turnbull, J., & Whitcomb, M. E. (1998). Report 1 learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools. Washington: AAMC.
Bentler, P. M. (2003). EQS (Version 6.1 Beta) [Computer Software]. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Burg, F. D., & Lloyd, J. S. (1983). Definitions of competence: A conceptual framework. In J. S. Lloyd, & D. G. Langsley (Eds.), Evaluating the skills of medical specialists (pp. 1–71). Chicago: American Board of medical Specialties.
Burg, F. D., Lloyd, J. S., & Templeton, B. (1982). Competence in medicine. Medical Teacher, 4(2), 60–64.
CanMEDS. (1996). Skills for the new millennium: Report of the societal needs working group. Ottawa, Canada: CanMEDS 2000 Project Societal Needs Working Group Report.
Epstein, R. M., & Hundert, E. M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA, 287(2), 226–235.
Forsythe, G. B., McGaghie, W. C., & Friedman, C. P. (1986). Construct validity of medical clinical competence measures: A multitrait-multimethod matrix study using confirmatory factor analysis. American Educational Research Journal 23(2), 315–336.
General-Medical-Council. (2001). Good medical practice. London: General Medical Council.
Greiner A. C., & Knebel E. (Eds.). (2003). Health profession education: a bridge to quality. Washington. D. C.: The National Academies Press.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–31.
Hubbard, J. P., Levit, E. J., Schumacher, C. F., & Schnabel, T. G. (1965). An objective evaluation of clinical competence: new technics used by the National Board of Medical examiners. New England Journal of Medicine, 272, 1321–1328.
Jolly, B. C. (1994). Bedside manner: teaching and learning in the hospital setting. University of Maastricht, Maastricht.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341.
McManus, I. C., Richards, P., Winder, B. C., & Sproston, K. A. (1998). Clinical experience, performance in final examinations, and learning style in medical students: Prospective study. BMJ, 316, 345–350.
Mennin, S. P., & Kalishman, S. (1998). Student assessment. Academic Medicine, 73(10:suppl), S46–S54.
Muzzin, L. J., & Hart, L. (1985). Oral examinations. In V. R. Neufeld, & G. R. Norman (Eds.), Assessing clinical competence. New York: Springer-Verlag.
NBME. (2002). Embedding professionalism in medical education: assessment as a tool for implementation. Baltimore: National Board of Medical Examiners.
Neufeld V. R. (1985). Historical perspectives on clinical competence. In V. R. Neufeld, & G. R. Norman (Eds.), Assessing clinical competence. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Newble, D. I. (1978). How do we measure clinical competence? The Medical Journal of Australia, 1, 637–639.
Pulito, A. R., Donelly, M. B., Plymale, M., & Mentzer, R. M. Jr. (2006). What do faculty observe of medical students’ clinical performance. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 18(2), 99–104.
Stern D. T. (Ed.). (2006). Measuring medical professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van der Hem-Stokroos, H. H., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., De Vries, H., & Haarman, H. J. T. M. (2001). How effective is a clerkship as a learning environment? Medical Teacher, 23(6), 599–604.
Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Scherpbier, A. J. J. A., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Verwijnen, G. M., & Wolfhagen, H. A. P. (2000). Clerkship assessment assessed. Medical Teacher, 22(6), 592–600.
Van Leeuwen, Y. D., Düsman, H., Mol, S. S. L., Pollemans, M. C., Drop, M. J., Grol, R. P. T. M., et al. (1997). Factors influencing the growth in knowledge of trainees in general practice. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2(1), 61–70.
Wass, V., Van der Vleuten, C., Shartzer, J., & Jones, R. (2001). Assessment of clinical competence. The Lancet, 357, 945–949.
Wimmers, P. F., Splinter, T. A. W., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). Influence of clerkship experiences on clinical competence. Medical Education, 40.
Windish, D. M., Paulman, P. M., Goroll, A. H., & Bass, E. B. (2004). Do clerkship directors think medical students are prepared for the clerkship years? Academic Medicine, 79(1), 56–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wimmers, P.F., Kanter, S.L., Splinter, T.A.W. et al. Is clinical competence perceived differently for student daily performance on the wards versus clerkship grading?. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 693–707 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9075-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9075-1