Endoscopy 2009; 41(10): 885-889
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215127
DDW highlights

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic ultrasound

J.-W.  Poley1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 October 2009 (online)

Introduction

More than 200 abstracts presented at DDW 2009 attested to the continuing development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Furthermore, EUS continues to evolve from a mere diagnostic modality to a mature endoscopic technique with increasing emphasis on interventional features. This evolution is also demonstrated by the growing number of abstracts dealing with quality and safety. Due to space constraints, only 20 abstracts can be reviewed. In my selection I have tried to incorporate abstracts on those issues that gastroenterologists and endoscopists frequently encounter in daily practice. However, I would like to encourage readers to browse through the many very interesting abstracts that have been published.

References

  • 1 Nguyen N Q, Binmoeller K F, Shah J N. et al . The impact of on-site cytopathology on the clinical evaluation and management of patients who undergo EUS-guided fine needle aspiration for suspected pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB110
  • 2 Song T J, Lee S S, Kim J H. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in solid pancreatic tumors; a prospective randomized comparison of 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB129
  • 3 Gill K R, Al-Haddad M A, Krishna M. et al . EchoBrush vs. standard endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) techniques for cytologic evaluation of cystic pancreatic lesions (CPLs): final results of blinded prospective comparison study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB234-AB235
  • 4 Fahmy M, Coyle W, Hasteh F. et al . Quality EUS-FNA: the potential for malignant cell carry-over and false-positive cytology during luminal tumor staging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB251
  • 5 De Frutos N C, Jamil L H, Gill K R. et al . Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), and bronchoscopy (TBNA) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) in patients with enlarged anterior vs. posterior mediastinal lymph nodes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB126
  • 6 Jamil L H, De Frutos N C, Gill K R. et al . Accuracy of EUS, EBUS, and combined EUS/EBUS for non-small cell lung cancer evaluation in patients with a negative CT and PET of the mediastinum.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB325
  • 7 Zuccaro G, Rice T W, Vargo J J. et al . A simple scoring system predicts which patients with esophageal cancer benefit from endoscopic ultrasound for lymph node classfication.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB128-AB129
  • 8 Ceppa E P, de la Fuente S G, Reddy S K. et al . 809 Does size really matter in the resection of primary cystic neoplasms of the pancreas?.  Gastroenterology. 2009;  136 (5 Suppl 1) A-879-879–A-880
  • 9 Rashdan A, Al-Haddad M A, Leblanc J K. et al . Do cyst fluid CEA and amylase levels help differentiate between mucinous pancreatic cysts?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB253
  • 10 Scimeca D, Gill K R, Krishna M. et al . S1305 Does fluid CEA level predict malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs)?.  Gastroenterology. 2009;  136 (5 Suppl 1) A-233
  • 11 Van Der Gaag N A, Nio C Y. et al . The value of endoscopic ultrasound in detecting periampullary tumors after a negative CT.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB250
  • 12 Harinck F, Kluijt I, Poley J-W. et al . 965 Comparative yield of endosonography and magnetic resonance imaging in individuals at high-risk for pancreatic cancer.  Gastroenterology. 2009;  136 (5 Suppl 1) A-147
  • 13 Figueiredo F A, Giovannini M, Bories E. et al . Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) strain ratio (SR-EUS) vs. contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS) for the diagnosis of focal pancreatic solid lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB129
  • 14 Larino J, Iglesias-Garcia J, Alvarez-Castro A. et al . 231 Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography for the detection of malignant infiltration of mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes.  Gastroenterology. 2009;  136 (5 Suppl 1) A-44
  • 15 Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino J, Dominguez-Munoz E. 853 Accuracy of second-generation endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography for the differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: a quantitative analysis of tissue stiffness.  Gastroenterology. 2009;  136 (5 Suppl 1) A-130
  • 16 Larghi A, Rossi E D, Galasso D, Stobinski M. et al . Performance of the forward viewing linear echoendoscope for fine needle aspiration of solid and cystic lesions throughout the GI tract: a large single center experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB323
  • 17 Wyse J M, Carone M, Usatii M. et al . Results of the first, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled trial of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) for pain due to newly diagnosed, inoperable pancreatic Cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB132
  • 18 Yague A S, Shah J N, Nguyen-Tang T, Binmoeller K F. EUS-guided therapy of bleeding gastric varices.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB138
  • 19 Chang K J, Ashida R, Muthusamy R. et al . Overall survival in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with a biologic using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) FNI or CT-guided injection: a single institution experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB132-AB3
  • 20 Varadarajulu S, Trevino J, Tamhane A, Wilcox C M. Transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting impacts treatment outcomes in patients undergoing endoscopic transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCS).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB267

J.-W. PoleyMD 

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands

PO Box: 2040
3000 CA
Rotterdam
The Netherlands

Fax: +31-10-7034680

Email: j.poley@erasmusmc.nl

    >