Skip to main content

The Past, the Present and the Future of Marketing Decision Models

Introduction to the Handbook

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbook of Marketing Decision Models

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 121))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pierson (1959)

  2. 2.

    Gordon and Howell (1959)

  3. 3.

    See also Chapter 16 of this Handbook

References

  • Aaker, D.A. 1975. ADMOD: An Advertising Decision Model. Journal of Marketing 12(1) 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M.M., L.M. Lodish. 1987. PROMOTER: An Automated Promotion Evaluation System. Marketing Science 6(2) 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M.M., L.M. Lodish. 1993. An Implemented System for Improving Promotion Productivity Using Store Scanner Data. Marketing Science 12(3) 248–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, W. 1962. Introduction in Frank., R.E., A.A. Kuehn, and W.F. Massy, eds. Quantitative Techniques in Marketing Analysis. Irwin, Homewood, IL, (xi–xvii).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, A., C.F. Mela. 2003. E-Customization. Journal of Marketing Research 40(2) 131–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmus, G., J.U. Farley, D.R. Lehmann. 1984. How Advertising Affects Sales: Meta-Analysis of Econometric Results. Journal of Marketing Research 21(1) 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F.M., R.D. Buzzel, M.R. Greene et al., Eds. 1961. Mathematical Models and Methods in Marketing. Homewood, Irwin, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F.M., J. Wind. 1995. Special Issue: Empirical Generalizations in Marketing. Marketing Science 14(3, Part 2 of 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blattberg, R.C., R. Glazer, J.D.C. Little, Eds.1994. The Marketing Information Revolution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, R.E., D.R. Lehmann, J.D.C. Little. 1998. From Decision Support to Decision Automation: A 2020 Vision. Marketing Letters 9 (3) 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin, R.E., C. Sismeiro. 2003. A Model of Web Site Browsing Behavior Estimated on Clickstream Data. Journal of Marketing Research 40(3) 249–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R.R., A. Rangaswamy, Y.Wind, J. Eliashberg. 1990. A Knowledge-Based System for Advertising Design. Marketing Science 9(3) 212–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzel, R.D. 1964. Mathematical Models and Marketing Management. Harvard University, Division of Research, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, P.D., L. Hoffman, T.P. Novak. 2003. Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts. Marketing Science 22(4) 520–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintagunta, P.K., D.C. Jain, N.J. Vilcassim. 1991. Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data. Journal of Marketing Research 28(4) 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.C. 1991. Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer. Marketing Science 10(4) 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke D.G. 1976. Economic Measurement of the Duration of Advertising Effects on Sales. Journal of Marketing Research 18(4) 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R., P.O. Steiner. 1954. Optimal Advertising and Optimal Quality. American Economic Review 44 826–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliashberg, J., G.L. Lilien. 1993. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Volume 5: Marketing. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J.F., M.R. Warshaw. 1964. Allocating Advertising Dollars by Linear Programming. Journal of Advertising Research 4 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.E., A.A. Kuehn, W.F. Massy, Eds. 1962. Quantitative Techniques in Marketing Analyses. Irwin, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.A., J.E. Howell. 1959.Higher Education for Business. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E., J.D. Caroll, S.M. Goldberg. 1981. A General Approach to Product Design Optimization via Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing 45(3), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E., V. Srinivasan. 1978. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5(2) 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagni, P.M., J.D.C. Little. 1983. A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data. Marketing Science 2(3) 203–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. 1988. Impact of Sales Promotions on When, What, and How Much to Buy. Journal of Marketing Research 259(4) 342–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., D.R. Lehmann, J.A. Stuart. 2004. Valuing Customers. Journal of Marketing Research 51(1) 71–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanssens, D.M., L.J. Parsons, R.L. Schultz. 2001. Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis(2 nd ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie, G.S., K.L. Lee, P.S. Fader. 2005. Counting Your Customers the Easy Way: An Alternative to the Pareto/NBD Model. Marketing Science 24(2) 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruschka, H. 1993. Determining Market Response Functions by Neural Network Modeling: A Comparison to Econometric Techniques. European Journal of Operations Research 66 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.Y., R. Staelin. 1999. Manufacturer Allowances and Retailer Pass-Through Rates in a Competitive Environment. Marketing Science 18(1) 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P.H. 1971.Marketing Decision Making: A Model Building Approach. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeflang, P.S.H., D.R. Wittink, M. Wedel, P.A. Naert. 2000.Building Models for Marketing Decisions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G.L., P.H. Kotler.1983. Marketing Decision Making: A Model-Building Approach. Harper & Row, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G.L., P.H. Kotler, K.S. Moorthy.1992. Marketing Models. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G.L., A. Rangaswamy. 2000. Modeled to Bits: Decision Models for the Digital Networked Economy. International Journal of Research in Marketing 17(2–3) 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G.L., A. Rangaswamy. 2004.Marketing Engineering: Computer Assisted Marketing Analysis and Planning. (2 nd ed.). Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.D.C. 1970. Models and Managers: The Concept of A Decision Calculus. Management Science 16 B466–B485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.D.C. 1979a. Aggregate Advertising Models: The State of the Art. Operations Research, 27(4) 629–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.D.C. 1979b. Decision Support Systems for Marketing Managers. Journal of Marketing 43(3) 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodish, L.M. 1971. CALLPLAN: An Interactive Salesman’s Call Planning System. Management Science 18(4 Part II) 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W.F., D.B. Montgomery, D.G. Morrison. 1970. Stochastic Models of Buying Behavior. M.I.T. Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, J.M., J.P. Gallagher.1990.Expert Systems for Scanner Data Environments. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, W.W., P.S. Fader. 2004. Dynamic Conversion Behavior at e-Commerce Sites.Management Science 50(3) 326–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorthy, K.S. 1993. Theoretical Modeling in Marketing.Journal of Marketing  57(2) 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.B., G.L. Urban.1969.Management Science in Marketing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.B., G.L. Urban, Eds. 1970.Applications of Management Sciences in Marketing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.B., C.B. Weinberg. 1973. Modeling Marketing Phenomena: A Managerial Perspective.Journal of Contemporary Business, Autumn, 17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naert, P.A., P.S.H. Leeflang, 1978.Building Implementable Marketing Models. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M., K.J. Arrow. 1962. Optimal Advertising Policy under Dynamic Conditions.Econometrica, 29 (May), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neslin, S.A. 1990. A Market Response Model for Sales Promotion.Marketing Science,9(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, F.C. 1959.The Education of American Businessmen. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., H. Raiffa, R. Schlaifer. 1965.Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory. Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W.J., V. Kumar. 2000. On the Profitability of Long-Life Customers in a Noncontractual Setting: An Empirical Investigation and Implications for Marketing.Journal of Marketing,64(4) 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W., J.S. Thomas, V. Kumar. 2005. Balancing Acquisition and Retention Resources to Maximize Customer Profitability.Journal of Marketing,69(1) 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.E., G.M. Allenby, R. McCulloch. 2005.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., A. Bechara, I. Levin, J.W. Alba, J.R. Bettman, L. Dube, A. Isen, B. Mellers, A. Smidts, S.J. Grant, A.P McCraw. 2005. Decision Neuroscience.Marketing Letters 16(3/4) 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk, A.J., G.L. Urban. 1978. Evaluation of New Packaged Goods: A Model and Measurement Methodology.Journal of Marketing Research 15(2) 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, G.J. 1988. The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales.Journal of Marketing Research 25(4) 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lans, R., G.H. Van Bruggen, J. Eliashberg, B. Wierenga. 2008. A Viral Branching Model for Predicting the Spread of ElectronicWord-of-Mouth in Viral Marketing Campaigns. Working paper RSM Erasmus University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidale, M.L., H.B. Wolfe. 1957. An Operations-Research Study of Sales Response to Advertising.Operations Research 5(3) 370–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, P.M., P.L. Brocket, L. Golden 1997. A Comparative Analysis of Neural Networks and Statistical Methods for Predicting Consumer Choice.Marketing Science 16(4) 370–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierenga, B., G.H. Van Bruggen. 2000.Marketing Management Support Systems: Principles, Tools, and Implementation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, D.R., M. Vriens, W. Burhenne. 1994. Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis in Europe: Results and Critical Reflections.International Journal of Research in Marketing 11(1) 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Berend Wierenga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wierenga, B. (2008). The Past, the Present and the Future of Marketing Decision Models. In: Wierenga, B. (eds) Handbook of Marketing Decision Models. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 121. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78213-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics