Introduction to the special section: Infrastructures and transitions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.001Get rights and content

Introduction

Energy, transport and water management systems provide crucial services to society. In view of the widely recognized need for a change towards a more sustainable society, these systems are faced with the need for a structural improvement in the way they deliver their societal functions. This is more easily said than done. The technical components (or physical infrastructures) such as power and gas distribution networks, as well as road and rail networks have long lifetimes and are slow to change, contributing to overall system inertia. In addition to this, the large costs, the large number of institutions and actors involved in development, maintenance and improvement of such infrastructures present a barrier to fast and fundamental change. In this special issue we refer to the whole of the technical and the societal components that work together in providing societal services like energy, mobility and water-supply and -safety as ‘infrasystems’.

The stability of infrasystems provides the basis for investments, planning and in general offers a certain level of predictability to society. But in times of fundamental change in society this stability can pose a major barrier to achieve desired sustainability transitions. In this issue we want to explore the tension between the societal demand for fundamental change towards sustainability and the inherent limitations to rapid change in large scale infrasystems. We frame infrasystems as complex socio-technological systems interwoven with each other and with various societal sectors to try to generate new insights and questions relevant to this topic. Research on transitions and transition management attempts to understand transitions, defined as long-term fundamental changes (irreversible, non-linear, multi-leveled and systemic) in the cultures (mental maps, perceptions), structures (formal institutions, and infrasystems) and practices (use of resources) of a societal system [1], [2].

The special section brings together work of researchers in infrastructure systems and researchers in transitions. Key questions central to the various papers are:

  • (a)

    What can infrasystem research community learn from transition research community?

  • (b)

    What is the role of infrasystems in societal transitions?

  • (c)

    What can the transition approach contribute to the long-term management and planning of infrastructure systems?

  • (d)

    Which transition governance practices are explored and possible to deal with infrastructure system transitions?

The papers originate from contributions to a special track on this topic at the International Conference on Infrastructure Systems (IEEE INFRA2008) “Building Networks for a Brighter Future”, held in November 2008 in Rotterdam [3]. In the years following the conference, the papers were expanded and reviewed by scientists rooted in either of the two fields, thereby gradually bringing both worlds of thought closer together. However this special issue still remains an exploratory one. While there is a clear societal necessity in getting a better grip on the topic of transitions in infrastructure systems, much remains to be done.

By way of introduction to the special section, we will first elaborate on infrastructure systems, and on transitions and transition research. We will explain the key questions addressed by the papers in this section, and we will end with brief summaries of each of these papers.

Section snippets

Infrastructures and infrasystems

Infrastructure-based systems provide crucial services to society, including but not limited to transport, energy, drinking water provision and waste-water removal and purification, and communication. We will use the term ‘ínfrastructure’ to denote the physical components of these systems. Typically, infrastructures have a networked character and consist of nodes (for example power plants, airports, waste-water processing plants, servers in ICT networks) and linkages between them (such as roads,

Transitions and transitions' research

Transitions as a phenomenon have been studied within several disciplines. Originally, the term transition was used to describe the ‘phase transitions’ of substances going from solid to liquid to gas, but since then the concept has been applied to a wide variety of different types of systems to describe shifts between qualitatively different states. The shift is not a linear but a chaotic and non-linear process of change. This model is called ‘punctuated equilibrium’ [12] and has been applied in

Exploring the intersection of infrasystems and transitions

This special section presents research efforts at the intersection of transition research and infrasystems. While non-linear fundamental change is the focus in transition research, this topic has so far barely been investigated in the context of infrasystems. One could even say that research on infrasystems is primarily concerned with understanding incremental change and how to optimize the existing system or structure. As becomes clear from the areas and cases touched upon in this special

Special section's contributions

This special section contains papers that explore the dynamics of infrasystems from a transition perspective, as well as the possibilities for developing strategies for enabling infrasystem changes towards sustainability. The way infrasystems evolve is understood by contextualizing their role and position within the broader context of the social system they are embedded in, for example looking at their interaction with the policy or market subsystems. In this special issue we have focused more

Discussion and future agenda

A sustainable society, in whatever form, requires changes that go beyond improvement of the existing. Most attention over the past decades has gone to debates about sustainable futures and competition between various technological or social innovations. The contributions to this special issue clearly identify an emerging new area of structural change, with a focus on infrasystems. In line with the transition concept, we argue that a broad consensus has emerged on the fact that our current

Acknowledgements

The editors of the special issue would like to thank Dr. Karel Mulder, Dr. Els van Daalen, Dr. Warren Walker, Dr. Aad Correlje, Dr. Bert van Wee, Dr. Jos Timmermans, Ir. Jan Kwakkel, Ir. Gonenc Yucel, Ir. Heleen Vreugdenhil, Ir. Hans de Haan, Ir. Flor Avelino and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable contributions in the review rounds of the present special section.

The present research effort is a product of research that has been conducted with the support of: (a) the KSI II.2 Research

Niki Frantzeskaki has worked as a PhD researcher at Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands. She is currently working with DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands focusing on institutions and policy transitions. She earned an MSc in Engineering and Policy Analysis from Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands and an MSc/BSc in Environmental Engineering from Technical University of Crete, Greece. Her research interests include policy analysis, policy dynamics,

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (55)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Niki Frantzeskaki has worked as a PhD researcher at Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands. She is currently working with DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands focusing on institutions and policy transitions. She earned an MSc in Engineering and Policy Analysis from Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands and an MSc/BSc in Environmental Engineering from Technical University of Crete, Greece. Her research interests include policy analysis, policy dynamics, social-ecological systems governance, institutions and transitions. Since her appointment in Erasmus University Rotterdam, she has been focusing on the intersection of institutions, policy transitions and dynamics for infrastructure systems (energy and water).

Derk Loorbach is a senior researcher and consultant at the Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT), Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands, where he received his PhD in June 2007. Central theme in his research is the development of the transition management approach as a new governance-model based on complex systems' thinking, governance theories and sociology. He is currently involved in various transition arenas, innovation programs and envisioning practices in areas of urban development, energy, health-care and housing. His research is seen as an example of ‘sustainability science’, combining fundamental with action research to contribute to sustainable development in practice.

Wil Thissen is a Professor in Policy Analysis at the Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands. He studied systems engineering at the TU Eindhoven. He received his PhD in the field of system- and control engineering/modeling and simulation. After his PhD he worked among others at the University of Virginia (U.S.A.) and with the Ministry of Transport and Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat) before he became involved with the preparation and realization of the Faculty of Technology, Policy Analysis and Management. His interest as head of the section lies with further development of policy analysis in a general sense, with particular attention to applications in integrated water-management, energy systems, research on uncertainty and uncertainty analysis, infrastructures, and sustainability.

View full text