Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:03:13.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An adult female patient with ring chromosome 21: behavioural phenotype and results of high-resolution molecular characterisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Willem M.A. Verhoeven*
Affiliation:
Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence for Neuropsychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Bregje Van Bon
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Jos I.M. Egger
Affiliation:
Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence for Neuropsychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands Behavioural Science Institute/Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Alexander Hoischen
Affiliation:
Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Jan C Doelman
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Admiraal De Ruyter Hospital, Goes, The Netherlands
*
Prof. Dr W.M.A. Verhoeven, Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Centre of Excellence for Neuropsychiatry, Stationsweg 46, 5803AC Venray, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 478527339 Fax: +31 478527110 E-mail: wverhoeven@vvgi.nl

Abstract

Verhoeven WMA, Bon BV, Egger JIM, Hoischen A, Doelman JC. An adult female patient with ring chromosome 21: behavioural phenotype and results of high-resolution molecular characterisation.

Objective

A female adult patient with mild to moderate mental retardation and minor dysmorphisms was referred for neuropsychiatric examination because of psychotic and autistic symptoms and impulsive behaviours.

Methods

Standardized neuropsychiatric and neuropsychological assessment as well as detailed somatic and neurological examination was performed. For genetic analysis, karyotyping, whole genome array analysis, and high-resolution detailed analysis of chromosome 21 were carried through.

Results

Karyotyping showed a de novo ring chromosome 21: 46,XX,der(21)r(21)(p11q22.3). High-resolution array analysis demonstrated a complex aberration consisting of an interstitial duplication in 21q21.1, an interstitial deletion in 21q22.2q22.3, an interstitial deletion in 21q22.3 and a terminal deletion of 21q22.3. Apart from mild dysmorphisms, visual and auditory impairments, and infertility, no somatic or neurological abnormalities were found. A formal psychiatric diagnosis could not be established. The behavioural problems and the supposed psychiatric symptoms could be related to her disharmonic social cognitive profile. The behaviour normalized after the patient returned to a stable and structured living environment.

Conclusion

High-resolution micro-array analysis techniques are essential to substantiate the genotype–phenotype correlation in patients with r(21) and other genetic disorders. Moreover, the results of this study stress the importance of the recognition of alexithymia as a potential cause for behavioural problems and psychiatric symptoms in patients with mental retardation in general.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lejeune, J.The 21 trisomy-current stage of chromosomal research. Prog Med Genet 1964;23:144177. Google ScholarPubMed
Crusi, A, Engel, E.Prenatal diagnosis of 3 cases of ring G chromosomes: one 21 and two 22, one of which was de novo. Annal de Génét 1986;29:253260. Google Scholar
Melnick, AR, Ahmed, I, Taylor, JC.Prenatal diagnosis of familial ring 21 chromosome. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:269273. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertini, V, Valetto, A, Uccelli, A, Tarantino, E, Simi, P.Ring chromosome 21 and reproductive pattern: a familial case and review of the literature. Fertil Steril 2008;90:2004e12004e5. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ieshima, A, Ogasawara, N, Yamamoto, Y, Kuroki, Y.A case of r(21) with stigmata of atypical Down syndrome. Hum Genet 1980;55:6569. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrante, E, Vignetti, P, Antonelli, M, Bruni, L, Bertasi, S, Chessa, L.Partial monosomy for a 21 chromosome. Helv Paediatr 1983;38:7280. Google ScholarPubMed
Rope, AF, Hinton, RB, Spicer, RL, Blough-Pfau, R, Saal, HM.Dilated ascending aorta in a child with ring chromosome 21 syndrome. Am J Med Genet 2004;130A:191195. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muencke, M, Bone, LJ, Mitchell, HFet al. Physical mapping of the holoprosencephaly critical region in 21q22.3, exclusion of SIM2 as a candidate gene for holoprosencephaly, and mapping of SIM2 to the region of chromosome 21 important for Down syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 1997;57:10741079Google Scholar
Pui, CH, Williams, DL, Scarnorough, V, Jackson, CW, Price, R, Murphy, S.Acute megakaryoblastic leukaemia associated with intrinsic platelet dysfunction and constitutional ring 21 chromosome in a young boy. Br J Haematol 1982;50:191200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohga, S, Nakao, F, Narazaki, Oet al. Hypogammaglobulinaemia in a patient with ring chromosome 21. Arch Dis Child 1997;77:252254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleczkowska, A, Fryns, JP.Ring chromosome 21 in a normal female. Annales de Génétique 1984;27:126128. Google Scholar
Huret, JL, Leonard, C, Kanoui, V.Ring chromosome 21 in a phenotypically normal but infertile man. Clin Genet 1985;28:541545. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinniss, MJ, Kazazian, HH, Stetten, Get al. Mechanisms of ring formation in 11 cases of human ring chromosome 21. Am J Hum Genet 1992;50:1528. Google ScholarPubMed
Crombez, EA, Dipple, KM, Schimmenti, LA, Rao, N.Duplication of the Down syndrome critical region does not predict facial phenotype in a baby with a ring chromosome 21. Clin Dysmorphol 2005;14:183187. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Steene, G, Van Haassen, PP, De Bruyn, EEJet al. WISC-R Nederlandstalige Uitgave: Verantwoording. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger 1991. Google Scholar
Asberg, M, Schalling, D.Construction of a new psychiatric rating instrument, the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS). Prog Neuropsychopharmacol 1979;3:405412. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luteijn, F, Barels, DPF.Groninger Intelligentie Test (GIT2). Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment 2004. Google Scholar
Nelson, HE.National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test Manual. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1982. Google Scholar
Lehfeld, H, Erzigkeit, H.The SKT, A short cognitive performance test for assessing deficits of memory and attention. Int Psychogeriatr 1997;9:115121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorst, HCM, Bermond, B.Validity and reliability of the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire. J Pers Individ Differ 2001;30:413434. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falik-Borenstein, TC, Probyl, TM, Pulst, SMet al. Stable ring chromosome 21: molecular and clinical definition of the lesion. Am J Med Genet 1992; 42:2228. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ki, A, Rauen, KA, Black, LDet al. Ring 21 chromosome and a satalitted 1p in the same patient: novel origin for an ectopic NOR. Am J Med Genet 2003;120A:365369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehling, D, Kennrrknecht, I, Junge, Aet al. Mild phenotype in two unrelated patients with a partial deletion of 21q22.2-q23.3 defined by FISH and molecular studies. Am J Med Genet 2004;131A:265272. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyle, R, Béna, F, Gagos, Set al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in Down syndrome identified by array CGH in 30 cases of partial monosomy chromosome 21. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17:454466. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bermond, B, Vorst, HC, Moormann, PP.Cognitive neuropsychology of alexithymia; implications for personality typology. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 2006;11:332360. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed