Skip to main content
Log in

Testing for Unit Roots in Market Shares*

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A unique characteristic of marketing data sets is the logical consistency requirement in market share models that market shares are bounded by 0 and 1, and they sum to unity. To take account of this logical consistency requirement, we propose to test for unit roots in individual market share series within the context of a market share attraction (MCI) framework. Our paper offers new contributions in testing for unit roots in market shares. First, a novel feature of our paper is that we propose a new unit root testing methodology designed to deal with the logical consistency requirement in market share models within the context of a market share attraction (MCI) framework. A second novel component of our paper is that we demonstrate how one could use the Johansen (1995) test to identify unit roots. This is implemented using Eviews software. The Johansen test is a system-based test rather than a single equation test; it is more appropriate given the dependencies in the market share relationships. Finally, we demonstrate using simulations that our procedure works well and improves substantially on the univariate Dickey-Fuller procedure. Accordingly, our procedure leads to better unit root inference than the univariate Dickey-Fuller method; the latter is not that reliable when dealing with market shares. We conclude the paper with suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, Anindya, Juan Dolado, John W. Galbraith, and David F. Hendry. (1993). Co-integration, Errorcorrection, and the Econometric Analysis of Nonstationary Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronnenberg, Bart J., Vijay Mahajan, and Wilfred R. Vanhonacker. (1999). “The Emergence of Market Structure in New Repeat-Purchase Categories: The Interplay of Market Share and Retailer Distribution,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Lee G., and M. Nakanishi. (1988). Market Share Analysis: Evaluating Competitive Marketing Effectiveness. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekimpe, Marnik G., and Dominique M. Hanssens. (1995). “Empirical Generalizations About Market Evolution and Stationarity,” Marketing Science, 14, G109–G121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekimpe, Marnik G., and Dominique M. Hanssens. (2000). “Time Series Models in Marketing: Past, Present and Future,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekimpe, Marnik G., Dominique M. Hanssens, and Jorge M. Silva-Risso. (1999). “Long-Run Effects of Price Promotions in Scanner Markets,” Journal of Econometrics, 89, 269–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, David A., and Wayne A. Fuller. (1981). “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root,” Econometrica, 49, 1057–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, Robert F., and Clive W. J. Granger. (1987). “Co-integration and Error-Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing,” Econometrica, 55, 251–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franses, Philip Hans, and Richard Paap. (1999). Testing Market Share Attraction Models, Research report 9918 of the Rotterdam Institute for Business Economic Studies.

  • Franses, Philip Hans, Teun Kloek, and Andre Lucas. (1999). “Outlier Robust Analysis of Long-Run Marketing Effects for Weekly Scanning Data,” Journal of Econometrics, 89, 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, Søren. (1988). “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, Søren. (1995). Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, George S., and In-Moo Kim. (1998). Unit Roots, Cointegration and Structural Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijs, Vincent, Marnik Dekimpe, Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, and Dominique M. Hanssens. (2001). “The Category Demand Effects of Price Promotions,” Marketing Science, 20, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Joon Y., and Peter C. B. Phillips. (1999). “Asymptotics for Nonlinear Transformations of Integrated Time Series,” Econometric Theory, 15, 269–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, Koen, Dominique M. Hanssens, and S. Siddarth. (2000). The Long-term Effect of Price Promotions on Category Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity, Working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.

  • Phillips, Peter C. B., and Hyungsik R. Moon. (1999). “Linear Regression Limit Theory for Nonstationary Panel Data,” Econometrica, 67, 1057–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Peter C. B., and Zhijie Xiao. (1998). “A Primer on Unit Root Testing,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 423–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, Shuba, and Frank M. Bass. (2000). “Cointegration Analysis of Brand Sales and Category Sales: Stationarity and Long-run Equilibrium in Market Shares,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 16, 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, Shuba, Peter Popkowski Leszczyc, and Frank M. Bass. (2000). “Market Share Response and Competitive Interaction: The Impact of Temporary, Evolving and Structural Changes in Prices,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franses, P.H., Srinivasan, S. & Boswijk, P. Testing for Unit Roots in Market Shares*. Marketing Letters 12, 351–364 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012276406686

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012276406686

Navigation