Skip to main content
Log in

Counterexamples to Segal's measure representation theorem

  • Published:
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses relations between several notions of continuity in rank-dependent utility, and in the generalized version of rank-dependent utility as initiated by Segal. Primarily, examples are given to show logical independencies between these notions of continuity. This also leads to counterexamples to Segal's (1989) characterizing theorem 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chateauneuf, A. (1990). “On the Use of Comonotonicity in the Axiomatization of EURDP Theory for Arbitrary Consequences,” CERMSEM, University of Paris I; extended abstract presented at Fifth International Conference on the Foundations and Applications of Utility, Risk and Decision Theory (FUR-90).

  • Chew, S.H. and L.G. Epstein. (1989). “A Unifying Approach to Axiomatic Non-Expected Utility Theories,”Journal of Economic Theory 49, 207–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H., L.G. Epstein, and P.P. Wakker. (1991). “A Unifying Approach to Axiomatic Non-Expected Utility Theories: Corrigenda,”Journal of Economic Theory, forthcoming.

  • Chew, S.H. and P.P. Wakker. (1991). “Generalizing Choquet Expected Utility by Weakening Savage's Sure-Thing Principle,” University of California, Irvine Research Unit in Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, MBS 91-16, Irvine, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1986). “The Axioms of Subjective Probability,”Statistical Science 1, 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, W.M. (1968). “The Structure of Utility Functions,”Review of Economic Studies 35, 367–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. and B. Jullien. (1988). “Ordinal Independence in Non-Linear Utility Theory,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1, 355–387. (“Erratum,” 2 (1989, 119).)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karn, E. and D. Schmeidler. (1990). “Utility Theory with Uncertainty.” In W. Hildenbrand and H. Sonnenschein (eds.),Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppe, C. (1990). “The Irrelevance Axiom, Relative Utility and Choice under Risk,” Department of Statistics and Mathematical Economics, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,”Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 3, 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. and P.P. Wakker. (1992). “The Axiomatic Basis of Anticipated Utility; A Clarification,” University of Nijmegen, NICI, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royden, H.L. (1963).Real Analysis. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1989). “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity,”Econometrica 57, 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1986). “On Lexicographic Probability Relations,”Mathematical Social Sciences 11, 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1989). “Anticipated Utility: A Measure Representation Approach,”Annals of Operations Research 19, 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1990). “Two-Stage Lotteries without the Reduction Axiom,”Econometrica 58, 349–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1992). “The Measure Representation: A Correction,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, this issue.

  • Wakker, P.P. (1990a). “Continuity, Absolute Continuity, and Weak Convergence in Anticipated-Utility Representations,” Fuqua School of Business, Duke University.

  • Wakker, P.P. (1990b). “Separating Marginal Utility and Probabilistic Risk Aversion,” working paper FSB-9005, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P.P. (1991a). “Additive Representations on Rank-Ordered Sets. I. The Algebraic Approach,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 35, 501–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P.P. (1991b). “Additive Representations on Rank-Ordered Sets. II. The Topological Approach,”Journal of Mathematical Economics, forthcoming.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This article is a rewritten version of Wakker (1990a). Puppe (1990) independently discovered that Segal's (1989) theorem 1 is not correct. This research has been made possible by a fellowship of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wakker, P. Counterexamples to Segal's measure representation theorem. J Risk Uncertainty 6, 91–98 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065352

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01065352

Key words

Navigation