Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Obliteration of the fistulous tract with BioGlue® adversely affects the outcome of transanal advancement flap repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Transanal advancement flap repair (TAFR) is useful in the treatment of high transsphincteric fistulas. Initially, promising results were reported. More recent studies have indicated that TAFR fails in one out of three patients. In almost all of our patients with a failure, we have observed healing of the flap except at the site of the original internal opening. A possible explanation for this remarkable finding might be persistent inflammation in the fistulous tract, finding a way out through the original internal opening. The question is whether obliteration of the fistulous tract by local installation at a surgical adhesive, can prevent persistent inflammation to break through the original opening. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether concomitant instillation of BioGlue could improve the healing rate following TAFR for high transsphincteric fistulas.

Methods

Between March 2006 and April 2006 a consecutive series of eight patients (four men, four women; median age 46 years) with a high transsphincteric fistula underwent TAFR after instillation of BioGlue in the fistulous tract. All patients were seen in the outpatient department for postoperative evaluation.

Results

Fistula healing was observed in only one patient (12.5%). All other patients experienced one or more of the following complications: prolonged severe pain (n=5), discharge of great amounts of purulent liquid from the external opening (n=3) and abscess formation (n=2), necessitating incision and drainage. Because of this unexpected outcome we decided to terminate the study prematurely.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that obliteration of the fistulous tract with BioGlue adversely affects the outcome of TAFR for high transsphincteric fistulas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wedell J, Meier zu Eissen P, Banzhaf G, Kleine L (1987) Sliding flap advancement for the treatment of high level fistulae. Br J Surg 74:390-91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oh C (1983) Management of high recurrent anal fistula. Surgery 93:330-32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kodner IJ, Mazor A, Shemesh EI et al (1993) Endorectal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal and other complicated anorectal fistulas. Surgery 114:682-89

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aguilar PS, Plasencia G, Hardy TG Jr et al (1985) Mucosal advancement in the treatment of anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 28:496-98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller GV, Finan PJ (1998) Flap advancement and core fistulectomy for complex rectal fistula. Br J Surg 85:108-10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schouten WR, Zimmerman DD, Briel JW (1999) Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1419-422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sonoda T, Hull T, Piedmonte MR, Fazio VW (2002) Outcomes of primary repair of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas using the endorectal advancement flap. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1622-628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB, van Gemert WG (2006) Long-term outcome following mucosal advancement flap for high perianal fistulas and fistulotomy for low perianal fistulas: recurrent perianal fistulas: failure of treatment or recurrent patient disease? Int J Colorectal Dis 21:784-90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB et al (2005) Staged mucosal advancement flap for the treatment of complex anal fistulas: pretreatment with noncutting Setons and in case of recurrent multiple abscesses a diverting stoma. Colorectal Dis 7:513-18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmerman DD, Delemarre JB, Gosselink MP et al (2003) Smoking affects the outcome of transanal mucosal advancement flap repair of trans-sphincteric fistulas. Br J Surg 90:351-54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O et al (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45:1616-621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis CN, Clark S (2006) Fibrin glue as an adjunct to flap repair of anal fistulas: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1736-740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van Koperen PJ, Wind J, Bemelman WA, Slors JF (2008) Fibrin glue and transanal rectal advancement flap for high transsphincteric perianal fistulas; is there any advantage? Int J Colorectal Dis 23:697-01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de la Portilla F, Rada R, Leon E et al (2007) Evaluation of the use of BioGlue in the treatment of high anal fistulas: preliminary results of a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 50:218-22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herget GW, Kassa M, Riede UN et al (2001) Experimental use of an albumin-glutaraldehyde tissue adhesive for sealing pulmonary parenchyma and bronchial anastomoses. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 19:4-

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hewitt CW, Marra SW, Kann BR et al (2001) BioGlue surgical adhesive for thoracic aortic repair during coagulopathy: efficacy and histopathology. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1609-612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coselli JS, Bavaria JE, Fehrenbacher J et al (2003) Prospective randomized study of a protein-based tissue adhesive used as a hemostatic and structural adjunct in cardiac and vascular anastomotic repair procedures. J Am Coll Surg 197:243-52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hidas G, Kastin A, Mullerad M et al (2006) Sutureless nephronsparing surgery: use of albumin glutaraldehyde tissue adhesive (BioGlue). Urology 67:697-00

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar A, Maartens NF, Kaye AH (2003) Evaluation of the use of BioGlue((R)) in neurosurgical procedures. J Clin Neurosci 10:661-64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sidle DM, Loos BM, Ramirez AL et al (2005) Use of BioGlue surgical adhesive for brow fixation in endoscopic browplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:393-97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tansley P, Al-Mulhim F, Lim E et al (2006) A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the effectiveness of BioGlue in treating alveolar air leaks. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 132:105-12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zehr KJ (2007) Use of bovine albumin-glutaraldehyde glue in cardiovascular surgery. Ann Thorac Surg; 84:1048-052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Biggs G, Hafron J, Feliciano J, Hoenig DM (2005) Treatment of splenic injury during laparoscopic nephrectomy with BioGlue, a surgical adhesive. Urology 66:882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Abbas MA, Tejirian T (2008) Bioglue for the treatment of anal fistula is associated with acute anal sepsis. Dis Colon Rectum. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9332-2

  25. Furst W, Banerjee A (2005) Release of glutaraldehyde from an albumin-glutaraldehyde tissue adhesive causes significant in vitro and in vivo toxicity. Ann Thorac Surg 79:1522-528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klimo P Jr, Khalil A, Slotkin JR et al (2007) Wound complications associated with the use of bovine serum albumin-glutaraldehyde surgical adhesive in pediatric patients. Neurosurgery 60:305-09

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Erasmi AW, Sievers HH, Wolschlager C (2002) Inflammatory response after BioGlue application. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1025-026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Colorectal Research Group Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, H 896 ’s Gravendijkwal 230, 3015, CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    S. M. Alexander, L. E. Mitalas, M. P. Gosselink, D. M. J. Oom, D. D. E. Zimmerman & W. R. Schouten

Authors
  1. S. M. Alexander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. E. Mitalas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. P. Gosselink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. M. J. Oom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. D. E. Zimmerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. W. R. Schouten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. R. Schouten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alexander, S.M., Mitalas, L.E., Gosselink, M.P. et al. Obliteration of the fistulous tract with BioGlue® adversely affects the outcome of transanal advancement flap repair. Tech Coloproctol 12, 225–228 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0425-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0425-7

Key words

Search

Navigation