Skip to main content
Research Articles

Blocking Is Sensitive to Causal Structure in 4-Year-Old and 8-Year-Old Children

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.4.264

Abstract. In a contingency learning task, 4-year-old and 8-year-old children had to predict the outcome displayed on the back of a card on the basis of cues presented on the front. The task was embedded in either a causal or a merely predictive scenario. Within this task, either a forward blocking or a backward blocking procedure was implemented. Blocking occurred in the causal but not in the predictive scenario. Moreover, blocking was affected by the scenario to the same extent in both age groups. The pattern of results was similar for forward and backward blocking. These results suggest that even young children are sensitive to the causal structure of a contingency learning task and that the occurrence of blocking in such a task defies an explanation in terms of associative learning theory.

References

  • Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., Pineño, O., Miller, R. R.(2005). Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 238– 249 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Bullock, M., Gelman, R., Baillargeon, R.(1982). The development of causal reasoning. In W. J. Friedman (Ed.), The developmental psychology of time (pp. 209-254). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J., Beckers, T.(2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55B, 289– 310 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J., Beckers, T.(2003). Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 345– 357 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., Glautier, S.(2002). Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 965– 985 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Houwer, J., Beckers, T., Vandorpe, S.(2005). Evidence for the role of higher-order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena. Learning & Behavior, 33, 239– 249 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Denniston, J. C., Savastano, H. I., Miller, R. R.(2001). The extended comparator hypothesis: Learning by contiguity, responding by relative strength. In R. R. Mowrer & S. B. Klein (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary learning theories (pp. 65-117). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dickinson, A.(2001). The 28th Bartlett memorial lecture: Causal learning: An associative analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 3– 25 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dickinson, A., Burke, J.(1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60– 80 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dickinson, A., Shanks, D., Evenden, J.(1984). Judgement of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29– 50 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gopnik, A., Glymour, C., Sobel, D. M., Schulz, L. E., Kushnir, T., Danks, D.(2004). A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets. Psychological Review, 111, 3– 32 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Kamin, L. J.(1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In R. M. Church (Ed.), Punishment and aversive behaviour (pp. 279-296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lovibond, P. F., Been, S.-L., Mitchell, C. J., Bouton, M. E., Frohardt, R.(2003). Forward and backward blocking of causal judgement is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude. Memory & Cognition, 31, 133– 142 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, R. R., Matzel, L. D.(1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pearl, J.(2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pineño, O., Denniston, J. C., Beckers, T., Matute, H., Miller, R. R.(2005). Contrasting predictive and causal values of predictors and of causes. Learning & Behavior, 33, 184– 196 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Rescorla, R. A., Wagner, A. R.(1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schlottmann, A.(1999). Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: How children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 35, 303– 317 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Shanks, D. R.(1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 1– 21 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shultz, T. R.(1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47, 1– 51 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sobel, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B., Gopnik, A.(2004). Children’s causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backward blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28, 303– 333 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tenenbaum, J. B., Griffiths, T. L.(2003). Theory-based causal inference. In S. Beckers, S. Thrun, & K. Obermayer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002 Neural Information Processing Systems Conference (pp. 35-42). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vandorpe, S., De Houwer, J. in press Forward cue competition in human causal learning: A comparison between forward blocking and reduced overshadowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vandorpe, S., De Houwer, J., Beckers, T. in press Further evidence for the role of inferential reasoning in forward blocking. Memory & Cognition, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A.(1994). Cue competition in causality judgements: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning & Motivation, 25, 127– 151 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, A. R.(1981). SOP. A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, M. R.(1996). Knowledge-based causal induction. In D. R. Shanks, K. J. Holyoak, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 34: Causal learning (pp. 47-88). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, M. R.(2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 53– 76 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, M. R.(2001). Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 600– 608 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, M. R., Holyoak, K. J.(1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 22– 236 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, M. R., Martignon, L.(1998). A Bayesian network model of causal learning. In Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1102-1107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, M. R., Walker, J. M.(2005). Competence and performance in causal learning. Learning & Behavior, 33, 211– 229 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Waldmann, M. R., Weber, A.(2004). Children’s sensitivity to structural implications of causal models. Manuscript submitted for publication. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, D. A., Sagness, K. E., McPhee, J. E.(1994). Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 694– 709 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar