Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Firm-size distribution and price-cost margins in Dutch manufacturing

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial economists surmise a relation between the size distribution of firms and performance. Usually, attention is focused on the high end of the size distribution. The widely used four-firm seller concentration ratio, C4, ignores what happens at the low end of the size distribution. We investigate to what extent the level and the growth of small business presence influence price-cost margins in Dutch manufacturing. We use a large data set of 66 industries for a thirteen year period. This allows the investigation of both small business influences within a framework in which that of many other market structure variables is also studied. Evidence is shown that price-cost margins are influenced by large firm dominance, growth in small business presence, capital intensity, business cycle, international trade and buyer concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1989, ‘Entrepreneurial Strategy and the Presence of Small Firms’,Small Business Economics 1, 193–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S., 1951, ‘Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936–1940’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 65, 293–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. and Y. M. Prince, 1990, ‘Data Set of Dutch Manufacturing per Three-Digit Industry, 1974–1986’, mimeograph, Department of Fundamental Research, Research Institute for Small and Medium-Sized Business, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, J. R. and P. K. Gorecki, 1990, ‘Measures of Market Structure and the Intensity of Competition’, paper presented at the XVII-th EARIE-Conference Lisbon 1990.

  • Bedrijfstakverkenning 1980,Deel 8:Chemische, rubber- en kunststofverwerkende industrie, Ministerie van Economische Zaken, 's-Gravenhage: Staatsuitgeverij.

  • Brooks, D., 1973,Market Structure and Seller Profitability, San Diego: University Press San Diego State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G. C., 1983,Econometrics, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Roger, Stephen Davies and Michael, Waterson, 1984, ‘The Profitability-Concentration Relation: Market Power or Efficiency?’,Journal of Industrial Economics 32, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. R. and L. E. Preston, 1969, ‘Price-Cost Margins and Industry Structure’,Review of Economics and Statistics 51, 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, J. A. and J. W. Penn, 1976, ‘The Concentration-Profitability Relationship: Is There a Critical Concentration Ratio?’,Journal of Industrial Economics 25, 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold, 1973,The Market Concentration Doctrine, Palo Alto: AIE-Hoover Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold, 1974, ‘Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly’, in H. J. Goldschmid, H. M. Mann and J. F. Weston (eds.),Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 164–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hertog, R. G. J., T. Kloek and A. R. Thurik, 1991, ‘Industrial Econometrics and Panel Data: A Full Costs Model of Retail Margins’, Report 9147/A, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz, I., R. G. Hubbard and B. C. Petersen, 1986, ‘Business Cycles and The Relationship Between Concentration and Price-Cost Margins’,Rand Journal of Economics 17, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dun, 1989,Dun's 15.000;The Most Important Dutch Enterprises 1990 (in Dutch: Dun's 15.000; De belang- rijkste Nederlandse ondernemingen 1990), Rotterdam: Dun & Bradstreet International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Het Financieele Dagblad, 1985,De omzetcijfers van 1984, nr. 230.

  • Kennedy, Peter, 1979,A Guide to Econometrics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalilzadeh-Shirazi, J., 1974, ‘Market Structure and Price-Cost Margins in United-Kingdom Manufacturing Industries’,Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka, J. E., Jr., 1979, ‘The Effect of Market Share Distribution on Industry Performance’,Review of Economics and Statistics 61, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka, J. E., Jr., 1981, ‘Does the Choice of Concentration Measure Really Matter?’,Journal of Industrial Economics 29, 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, S. H., 1975, ‘The Impact of Buyer Concentration in Manufacturing Industries’,Review of Economics and Statistics 57, 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Stephen, 1988,Industrial Economics, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Stephen, 1988, ‘Market Power and/or Efficiency?’,Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. A., 1967, ‘Marginal Concentration Ratios and Industrial Profit Rates’,Southern Economic Journal 34, 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagoulatos, E. and R. Sorensen, 1976, ‘Foreign Trade, Concentration and Profitability in Open Economies’,European Economic Review 8, 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Y. M. and A. R. Thurik, 1990, ‘Concentration and Cyclical Behaviour of Price-Cost Margins in Dutch Manufacturing’, Research paper 90.01, Department of Fundamental Research, Research Institute for Small and Medium-Sized Business, Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Y. M. and A. R Thurik, 1992, ‘Price-Cost Margins in Dutch Manufacturing: Effects of Concentration, Business Cycle and International Trade’,De Economist 140.

  • Ravenscraft, David J., 1983, ‘Structure-Profit Relationships at the Line of Business and Industry Level’,Review of Economics and Statistics 65, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1980,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand Mcnally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and David, Ross, 1990,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard, 1985, ‘Do Markets Differ Much?’,American Economic Review 75, 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard, 1987, ‘Collusion Versus Differential Efficiency: Testing Alternative Hypotheses’,Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 399–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard, 1989, ‘Inter-Industry Studies of Structure and Performance’, in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds.),Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. II, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 952–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Ute, 1991, ‘Buyer Structure and Seller Performance in U.S. Manufacturing Industries’,Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, M. de and E. Wever, 1987,The Dutch Manufacturing Industry: Position, Dispersion and Structure (in Dutch: De Nederlandse industrie: positie, spreiding en struktuur), Assen: Van Gorcum & Comp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. J., 1989, ‘Firm Performance and Size: Explanations from the Small Firm Sectors’,Small Business Economics 1, 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Cate, A. and A. H. Sprangers, 1985, ‘Concentration and Deconcentration in Manufacturing Industries (1976 and 1981)’,Statistisch Magazine (CBS) 5, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Leonard W., 1974, ‘The Concentration-Profits Relationship and Antitrust’, in H. J. Goldschmid, H. M. Mann and J. F. Weston (eds.),Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, pp. 184–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Leonard W. (ed.), 1989,Concentration and Price, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Leonard W., 1991, ‘Concentration, Price, and Critical Concentration Ratios’, in David B. Audretsch and Hideki Yamawaki (eds.),Structure, Conduct and Performance, New York: New York University Press, pp. 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. J., 1976, ‘Searching for the Critical Concentration Ratio: An Application of the Switching Regimes’ Technique’, in S. M. Goldfeld and R. E. Quandt (eds.),Studies in Nonlinear Estimation, Cambridge: Ballinger, pp. 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Fundamental Research, Research Institute for Small and Medium-Sized Business (EIM), P.O. Box 7001, 2701, AA Zoetermeer, The Netherlands

    Yvonne Prince & Roy Thurik

  2. Department of Fundamental Research, Research Institute for Small and Medium- Sized Business (EIM), P.O. Box 7001, 2701, AA Zoetermeer

    Yvonne Prince & Roy Thurik

  3. Centre for Advanced Small Business Economics (CASBEC) of Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR), P.O. Box 1738, 3000, DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Yvonne Prince & Roy Thurik

Authors
  1. Yvonne Prince
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Roy Thurik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prince, Y., Thurik, R. Firm-size distribution and price-cost margins in Dutch manufacturing. Small Bus Econ 5, 173–186 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531914

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531914

Keywords

Search

Navigation