Skip to main content
Log in

The intertemporal stability of the concentration-margins relationship in Dutch and U.S. manufacturing

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Factors influencing price-cost margins are investigated using a rich panel data base of the Dutch manufacturing sector. Attention is devoted to the intertemporal stability of the relationship explaining price-cost margins and to a comparison with U.S. results. Our results indicate that isolated cross-section analyses can be misleading. Evidence is provided for similarities and dissimilarities between the U.S. and the Netherlands when explaining price-cost margins. Dutch margins are influenced by industry-specific factors such as sales changes, import competition, capital intensity and operating expenses. Domestic seller concentration, aggregate capacity utilization and export intensity play no distinct roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caves, R. E. (1985) ‘International trade and industrial organization: problems, solved and unsolved’,European Economic Review 28, 377–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. R. and Preston, L. E. (1969), ‘Price-cost margins and industry structure’,Review of Economics and Statistics 51, 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubbin, J. S. (1988)Market Structure and Performance — The Empirical Research, Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, H. W. (1991) ‘The takeover market in Europe: control structures and the performance of large companies compared’,Review of Industrial Organization 6, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R. G. and Petersen, B. C. (1986a) ‘Business cycles and the relationship between concentration and price-cost margins’,Rand Journal of Economics 17, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R. G. and Petersen, B. C. (1986b) ‘The intertemporal stability of the concentration-margins relationship’,Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domowitz, I., Hubbard, R. G. and Petersen, B. C. (1987) ‘Oligopoly supergames: some empirical evidence on prices and margins’,Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frantzen, D. J. (1986) ‘The cyclical behaviour of manufacturing prices in a small open economy’,Journal of Industrial Economics 34, 389–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. (1982) ‘Simultaneous equations models of the structure-performance paradigm’,European Economic Review 19, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, V. and Michel, P. (1988) ‘Adjustment costs, concentration and price behaviour’,Journal of Industrial Economics 36, 477–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, R. W. (1981) ‘Price-cost margins and manufacturing industry structure’,European Economic Review 16, 247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalilzadeh-Shirazi, J. (1974) ‘Market structure and price-cost margins in United Kingdom manufacturing industries’,Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (1980)Principles of Marketing, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwoka, J. E., Jr. (1979) ‘The effect of market share distribution on industry performance’,Review of Economics and Statistics 61, 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (1988)Industrial Economics, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, W. F. and Sial, M. H. (1993) ‘Cyclical variation in the profit-concentration relationship’,Review of Industrial Organization 8, 277–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., Böbel, I. and Haid, A. (1983) ‘Business cycle and industrial market power: an empirical investigation for West German industries, 1965–1977’,Journal of Industrial Economics 32, 187–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odagiri, H. and Yamashita, T. (1987) ‘Price mark-ups, market structure and business fluctuations in Japanese manufacturing industries’,Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagoulatos, E. and Sorensen, R. (1976) ‘Foreign trade, concentration and profitability in open economies’,European Economic Review 8, 255–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. (1974) ‘Consumer behavior, retailer power and market performance in consumer goods industries’,Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 419–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Y. M. and Thurik, A. R. (1992) ‘Price-cost margins in Dutch manufacturing: effects of concentration, business cycle and international trade’,De Economist 140, 310–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Yvonne and Thurik, Roy (1993) ‘Firm-size distribution and price-cost margins in Dutch manufacturing’,Small Business Economics 5, 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugel, T. A. (1980) ‘Foreign trade and U.S. market performance’,Journal of Industrial Economics 29, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinger, Michael (1990) The concentration-margins relationship reconsidered, in M. N. Baily and C. Winston (eds),Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 1990, Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 287–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and Ross, David (1990)Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. (1989) Inter-industry studies of structure and performance, in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds),Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. II, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 952–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Ute (1991), Buyer structure and seller performance in U.S. manufacturing industries,Review of Economics and Statistics 73, 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurik, A. R. and van der Hoeven, W. H. M. (1989) ‘Manufacturing margins: differences between small and large firms’,Economics Letters 29, 353–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nieuwkerk, Marius and Sparling, Robert P. (1985)The Netherlands International Direct Investment Position, Monetary Monographs no. 4, De Nederlandsche Bank.

  • White, H. (1980) ‘A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity’,Econometrica 48, 817–838.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was sponsored in part by the Economics Research Foundation, which is part of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. We wish to thank H. W. de Jong, Leo Sleuwaegen, David Audretsch and Aad Kleijweg for their useful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prince, Y., Thurik, R. The intertemporal stability of the concentration-margins relationship in Dutch and U.S. manufacturing. Rev Ind Organ 9, 193–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01035659

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01035659

Key words

Navigation