We show that results in the recent strand of the literature, which tries to explain stock returns by weather induced mood shifts of investors, might be data-driven inference. More specifically, we consider two recent studies [Kamstra, Mark J., Kramer, Lisa A., Levi, Maurice D., 2003a. Winter blues: A SAD stock market cycle. American Economic Review 93(1), 324–343; Cao, Melanie, Wei, Jason, 2005. Stock market returns: A note on temperature anomaly. Journal of Banking and Finance 29(6), 1559–1573] that claim that a seasonal anomaly in stock returns is caused by mood changes of investors due to lack of daylight and temperature variations, respectively. While we confirm earlier results in the literature that there is indeed a strong seasonal effect in stock returns in many countries: stock market returns tend to be significantly lower during summer and fall months than during winter and spring months as documented by Bouman and Jacobsen [Bouman, Sven, Jacobsen, Ben, 2002. The Halloween indicator, Sell in May and go away: Another puzzle. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1618–1635], there is little evidence in favor of a SAD or temperature explanation. In fact, we find that a simple winter/summer dummy best describes this seasonality. Our results suggest that without any further evidence the correlation between weather-related variables and stock returns might be spurious and the conclusion that weather affects stock returns through mood changes of investors is premature.

Additional Metadata
Keywords seasonal affective disorder, sell in May, spurious correlations, stock market seasonality, temperature effect;
JEL General Financial Markets: General (jel G10), Asset Pricing (jel G12)
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.08.004, hdl.handle.net/1765/13586
Series ERIM Top-Core Articles
Journal Journal of Banking & Finance
Jacobsen, B, & Marquering, W.A. (2008). Is it the Weather?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(4), 526–540. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.08.004