In health insurance, a traditional deductible (i.e. with a deductible range [0,d]) is in theory not effective in reducing moral hazard for individuals who know (ex-ante) that their expenditures will exceed the deductible amount d, e.g. those with a chronic disease. To increase the effectiveness, this paper proposes to shift the deductible range to [si,si + d], with starting point si depending on relevant risk characteristics of individual i. In an empirical illustration we assume the optimal shift to be such that the variance in out-of-pocket expenditures is maximized. Results indicate that for the 10-percent highest risks in our data the optimal starting point of a €1000-deductible is to be found (far) beyond €1200, which corresponds with a deductible range of [1200,2200] or further. We conclude that, compared to traditional deductibles, shifted deductibles with a risk-adjusted starting point lower out-of-pocket expenditures and may further reduce moral hazard.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Deductibles, Health insurance, Health status, Moral hazard, Risk, disease, health insurance, health status, risk assessment
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.007, hdl.handle.net/1765/15067
Citation
van Kleef, R.C., van de Ven, W.P.M.M., & van Vliet, R.C.J.A.. (2009). Shifted deductibles for high risks: More effective in reducing moral hazard than traditional deductibles. Journal of Health Economics, 28(1), 198–209. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.007