Background. Virological failure of first-line antiretroviral therapy based on lopinavir boosted with ritonavir (lopinavir/r) has rarely been associated with resistance in protease. We identified a new genotypic resistance pathway in 3 patients who experienced failure of first-line lopinavir/r treatment. Methods. Viral protease and the C-term part of Gag were sequenced. The observed mutations were introduced in a reference strain to investigate impact on protease inhibitor susceptibility and replication capacity. Results. A detailed longitudinal analysis demonstrated the selection of the M46I+L76V protease mutations in all 3 patients. The L76V conferred a solitary 3.5-fold increase in one-half the maximal inhibitory concentration to lopinavir but severely hampered viral replication. Addition of M46I, which did not confer any lopinavir resistance on its own, had a dual effect. It partly compensated for the loss in replication capacity and increased the one-half maximal inhibitory concentration to above the lower clinical cutoff (11-fold). Analysis of a large clinical database (>180,000 human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] sequences) demonstrated a significant association (Spearman p, 0.93) between the increased presence of L76V in clinical samples (0.5% in 2000 to 3.4% in 2006) and lopinavir prescription over time. Conclusions. The HIV protease substitution L76V, in combination with M46I, confers clinically relevant levels of lopinavir resistance and represents a novel resistance pathway to first-line lopinavir/r therapy.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
doi.org/10.1086/605329, hdl.handle.net/1765/17581
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam

Nijhuis, M., Wensing, A., Bierman, W., de Jong, D., Kagan, R., Fun, A., … Boucher, C. (2009). Failure of treatment with first-line lopinavir boosted with ritonavir can be explained by novel resistance pathways with protease mutation 76V. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 200(5), 698–709. doi:10.1086/605329