Subtalar versus triple arthrodesis after intra-articular calcaneal fractures
Depending upon initial treatment, between 2 and 30% of patients with a displaced intra-articular calcaneal fracture require a secondary arthrodesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of subtalar versus triple arthrodesis on functional outcome. A total of 33 patients with 37 secondary arthrodeses (17 subtalar and 20 triple) with a median follow-up of 116 months were asked to complete questionnaires regarding disease-specific functional outcome (Maryland Foot Score, MFS), quality of life (SF-36) and overall satisfaction with the treatment (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS). Patient groups were comparable considering median age at fracture, initial treatment (conservative or operative), time to arthrodesis, median follow-up, and post-arthrodesis radiographic angles. The MFS score was similar after subtalar versus triple arthrodesis (59 vs. 56 points; P = 0.79). No statistically significant difference was found for the SF-36 (84 vs. 83 points; P = 0.67) and the VAS (5 vs. 6; P = 0.21). Smoking was statistically significantly associated with a non-union (χ2 = 6.60, P = 0.017). The current study suggests that there is no significant difference in functional outcome between an in situ subtalar or triple arthrodesis as a salvage technique for symptomatic arthrosis after an intra-articular calcaneal fracture. Smoking is a risk factor for non-union.
|Keywords||Arthrodesis, Calcaneus, Outcome|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-010-0084-x, hdl.handle.net/1765/21227|
Schepers, T, Kieboom, B.C.T, Bessems, J.H.J.M, Vogels, L.M.M, van Lieshout, E.M.M, & Patka, P. (2010). Subtalar versus triple arthrodesis after intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction, 5(2), 97–103. doi:10.1007/s11751-010-0084-x