Not doing bad things is not equivalent to doing the right thing: Distinguishing between inhibitory and initiatory self-control
The present study investigated whether a conceptual distinction between two components of self-control (inhibitory and initiatory self-control) is empirically valid. To that purpose, a series of confirmative factor analyses were employed in two samples (total N = 577), providing support for a distinction between inhibitory and initiatory self-control. In addition, the predictive validity of the two components of self-control was examined by regression analyses with (un)desired health/academic behavior as dependent variables, showing that inhibitory self-control was a superior predictor of undesired behavior and initiatory self-control a better predictor of desired behavior.
|Keywords||Goal-directed behavior, Inhibition, Self-control|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.015, hdl.handle.net/1765/22823|
de Ridder, D.T.D., de Boer, B.J., Lugtig, P., Bakker, A.B., & van Hooft, E.A.J.. (2011). Not doing bad things is not equivalent to doing the right thing: Distinguishing between inhibitory and initiatory self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 1006–1011. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.015