The present study investigated whether autonomic flexibility predicted future anxiety levels in adolescent boys and girls. This study is part of the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS), a prospective cohort study of Dutch adolescents. The current study included a subsample of 965 individuals. Measures of autonomic flexibility, i.e., heart rate (HR) and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), were determined during the first assessment wave (T1: participants 10–12 years old). Self-reported anxiety was assessed at the first and second assessment wave (T2: participants 12–14 years old). Possible gender differences and cooccurring depressive problems were examined. In girls, low RSA predicted anxiety levels 2 years later. In boys, no associations between HR and RSA and future anxiety were found. We conclude that in adolescent girls from the general population, signs of reduced autonomic flexibility (i.e., low RSA) predict future anxiety levels. Since the effect size was small, at this point, RSA reactivity alone cannot be used to identify individuals at risk for anxiety, but should be regarded as one factor within a large group of risk factors. However, if the present findings are replicated in clinical studies, intervention programmes – in the future – aimed at normalising autonomic functioning may be helpful.

Additional Metadata
Keywords *Sex Characteristics, Adolescence, Adolescent, Anxiety/*complications/*diagnosis, Arrhythmia, Sinus/etiology, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/*etiology, Child, Female, Gender, Health Surveys, Heart Rate/physiology, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective, Regression Analysis, Respiratory sinus arrhythmia, Spectrum Analysis
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.014, hdl.handle.net/1765/23065
Citation
Greaves-Lord, K., Tulen, J.H.M., Dietrich, A., Sondeijker, F.E.P.L., van Roon, A.M.M., Oldehinkel, A.J., … Huizink, A.C.. (2010). Reduced autonomic flexibility as a predictor for future anxiety in girls from the general population: The TRAILS study. Psychiatry Research, 179(2), 187–193. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2009.04.014