Background and purpose: To investigate the dosimetric impact of not editing auto-contours of the elective neck and organs at risk (OAR), generated with atlas-based autosegmentation (ABAS) (Elekta software) for head and neck cancer patients. Materials and methods: For nine patients ABAS auto-contours and auto-contours edited by two observers were available. Based on the non-edited auto-contours clinically acceptable IMRT plans were constructed (designated 'ABAS plans'). These plans were then evaluated for the two edited structure sets, by quantifying the percentage of the neck-PTV receiving more than 95% of the prescribed dose (V95) and the near-minimum dose (D99) in the neck PTV. Dice coefficients and mean contour distances were calculated to quantify the similarity of ABAS auto-contours with the structure sets edited by observer 1 and observer 2. To study the dosimetric importance of editing OAR auto-contours a new IMRT plan was generated for each patient-observer combination, based on the observer's edited CTV and the non-edited salivary gland auto-contours. For each plan mean doses for the non-edited glands were compared with doses for the same glands edited by the observer. Results: For both observers, edited neck CTVs were larger than ABAS auto-contours (p ≤ 0.04), by a mean of 8.7%. When evaluating ABAS plans on the PTVs of the edited structure sets, V95reduced by 7.2% ± 5.4% (1 SD) (p < 0.03). The mean reduction in D99was 14.2 Gy (range 1-54 Gy). Even for Dice coefficients >0.8 and mean contour distances <1 mm, reductions in D99up to 11 Gy were observed. For treatment plans based on observer PTVs and non-edited auto-contoured salivary glands, the mean doses in the edited glands differed by only -0.6 Gy ± 1.0 Gy (p = 0.06). Conclusions: Editing of auto-contoured neck CTVs generated by ABAS is required to avoid large underdosages in target volumes. Often used similarity measures for evaluation of auto-contouring algorithms, such as dice coefficients, do not predict well for expected PTV underdose. Editing of salivary glands is less important as mean doses achieved for non-edited glands predict well for edited structures.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Autosegmentation, Dice coefficient, Dosimetry, Head and neck, Mean distance
Persistent URL,
Voet, P.W.J, Dirkx, M.L.P, Teguh, D.N, Hoogeman, M.S, Levendag, P.C, & Heijmen, B.J.M. (2011). Does atlas-based autosegmentation of neck levels require subsequent manual contour editing to avoid risk of severe target underdosage? A dosimetric analysis. Radiotherapy & Oncology, 98(3), 373–377. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.017