Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of low- and high-dose sirolimus release (25, 40, or 100 μg) from hydroxyapatite (HAp) with Cypher (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) (111 μg sirolimus) in porcine coronary arteries. Background: Polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents such as Cypher interfere with vascular healing, probably due to the permanent presence of the polymer coating and the high sirolimus dose. The use of low-dose sirolimus and inert nonpolymeric but biodegradable coatings such as HAp might be more appropriate. Methods: Stents (n = 68) were implanted, guided by quantitative coronary angiography. All swine received clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid during 28 days follow-up. Safety of the coating in absence of drugs was studied by comparing HAp with and without a lipid-based release regulating layer (HApR) with bare-metal stents. Efficacy was studied by comparing the release of 25, 40, and 100 μg sirolimus with Cypher. Results: The safety study (without drug) revealed no differences in neointimal thickening in response to HAp and HApR with complete healing in all groups. Dose response analysis showed that neointimal thickening was similar in all groups regardless of sirolimus dose, with a normal appearance of the endothelium. There was, however, a dose-dependent increase in fibrinoid (p = 0.028), considered to be a marker of delayed healing. The Cypher stent induced the highest amount of fibrinoid. Conclusions: Reducing the dose of sirolimus eluting from a biocompatible HAp coated stent reduces signs of delayed vascular healing, without affecting neointimal hyperplasia.

Additional Metadata
Keywords PCI, animal model, coronary, drug eluting stent, nonpolymeric coatings
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2008.12.012, hdl.handle.net/1765/24408
Citation
van der Giessen, W.J, Sorop, O, Serruys, P.W.J.C, Peters-Krabbendam, I, & van Beusekom, H.M.M. (2009). Lowering the Dose of Sirolimus, Released From a Nonpolymeric Hydroxyapatite Coated Coronary Stent, Reduces Signs of Delayed Healing. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2(4), 284–290. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2008.12.012