Objective: Congenital valvular aortic stenosis is a common congenital heart malformation. The rate of progression in childhood, however, remains to be established. We assessed the progression of peak aortic velocity before intervention as well as the frequency of intervention in paediatric patients with isolated congenital valvular aortic stenosis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 245 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis. Both clinical and echocardiographic data were obtained. Results: Over a period of 9.0 (SD 5.2) years (range 0.1-19.4), the mean annual increase in peak systolic velocity was 0.04 m/s/year (95% CI 0.028 to 0.056 m/s/year; p<0.001) as shown by ANOVA. 40 patients underwent a cardiac intervention shortly after their first echocardiogram. Another 33 patients underwent intervention during follow-up. Interventions were performed significantly more often in patients diagnosed at a younger age and/or with a higher peak velocity at diagnosis (p<0.001). Mortality was considerable in those diagnosed in infancy (5-year survival rate of 73% (SD 9%), whereas it was nearly absent in patients diagnosed after infancy. Most patients who died during infancy had progressive left ventricular dysfunction despite adequate relief of left ventricular outflow obstruction. Conclusions: Valvular aortic stenosis in the paediatric age group usually has a good prognosis beyond the neonatal period. Progression over time is usually limited, although a considerable proportion of patients need intervention shortly after initial diagnosis. Mortality, except for the neonatal age group, is nearly absent.

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.134924, hdl.handle.net/1765/24872
ten Harkel, A.D.J., Berkhout, M., Hop, W.C.J., Witsenburg, M., & Helbing, W.A.. (2009). Congenital valvular aortic stenosis: Limited progression during childhood. Archives of Disease in Childhood: an international peer-reviewed journal for health professionals and researchers covering conception to adolescence, 94(7), 531–535. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.134924