Objective: To investigate accuracy and reliability of four different ultrasound-related volume-measuring methods. Design: Observational study. Setting: Both in vitro and in vivo. Population or Sample: Ten phantoms for in vitro measurements and 28 pregnancies with gestational ages ranging from 6 to 11 weeks for in vivo measurements were included. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound images of phantoms (with known variable contents) and yolk sacs were used to calculate volumes using four different methods: Virtual Organ Computed-Aided AnaLysis (VOCAL), inversion mode, Sono Automatic Volume Calculation (SonoAVC) and V-Scope. V-Scope is a newly developed 3D volume visualisation application using a Barco I-Space virtual reality system. Intra- and interobserver agreement was established by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Main outcome measure: Evaluation of accuracy and reliability by comparing the different techniques with true volumes (in vitro) and with each other (in vitro and in vivo). Results: In the in vitro study, volume measurements by VOCAL, inversion mode and V-Scope proved to be accurate. SonoAVC measurements resulted in a substantial systematic underestimation. Correlation coefficients of measured versus true volumes were excellent in all four techniques. For all techniques, an intra- and interobserver agreement of at least 0.91 was found. Yolk sac measurements by the different techniques proved to be highly correlated (ICCs > 0.91). Conclusions: We demonstrated that VOCAL, inversion mode and V-Scope can all be used to measure volumes of hypoechoic structures. The newly introduced V-Scope application proved to be accurate and reliable.

Additional Metadata
Keywords Inversion mode, SonoAVC, V-Scope, VOCAL, Virtual reality, Yolk sac volumes
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02006.x, hdl.handle.net/1765/25102
Rousian, M, Verwoerd-Dikkeboom, C.M, Koning, A.H.J, Hop, W.C.J, van der Spek, P.J, Exalto, N, & Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.M. (2009). Early pregnancy volume measurements: Validation of ultrasound techniques and new perspectives. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116(2), 278–285. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02006.x