Background: This article discusses data from 3 randomized phase 3 trials, supporting a role for surgery in glioblastoma. Methods: Data were reviewed by extent of resection during primary surgery from the ALA-Glioma Study (fluorescence-guided versus conventional resection), the BCNU wafer study (BCNU wafer versus placebo), and the EORTC Study 26981-22981 (radiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide). Results: For glioblastoma patients in the ALA study, median survival was 16.7 and 11.8 months for complete versus partial resection, respectively (P<0.0001). Survival effects were maintained after correction for differences in age and tumor location. For glioblastoma patients who received ≥90% resection in the BCNU wafer study, median survival increased for BCNU wafer versus placebo (14.5 versus 12.4 months, respectively; P=0.02), but no survival increase was found for <90% resection (11.7 versus 10.6 months, respectively; P=0.98). In the EORTC study, absolute median gain in survival with chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy was greatest for complete resections (+4.1 months; P=0.0001), compared with partial resections (+1.8 months; P=0.0001), or biopsies (+1.5 months; P=0.088), suggesting surgery enhanced adjuvant treatment. Conclusion: Complete resection appears to improve survival and may increase the efficacy of adjunct/adjuvant therapies. If safely achievable, complete resection should be the surgical goal for glioblastoma.

, , , ,
doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1001-x, hdl.handle.net/1765/26613
Acta Neurochirurgica
Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam

Stummer, W., van den Bent, M., & Westphal, M. (2011). Cytoreductive surgery of glioblastoma as the key to successful adjuvant therapies: New arguments in an old discussion. Acta Neurochirurgica, 153(6), 1211–1218. doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1001-x