Purpose Of Review: Results of trials determining if pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs prevents transmission of HIV are expected soon. Tenofovir and emtricitabine-currently evaluated as PrEP-are popular in treatment of HIV. Drug resistance could, therefore, be critical in the use of PrEP. We review the literature regarding risks associated with drug resistance owing to PrEP. Recent Findings: Few studies addressed the issue of drug resistance to tenofovir and/or emtricitabine. Studies in HIV-1-infected individuals followed small numbers of patients for a short time. Studies in macaques were well designed, but used SHIV, which has an attenuated course of infection. The available information suggests that the probability of emergence of drug resistance is small. Infections that occurred despite use of PrEP had reduced peak viremia, which could reduce HIV transmissibility. Mathematical modeling suggests that, although transmitted drug resistance may under some circumstances increase, the benefits of PrEP outweigh the risks associated with resistance. Summary: Tenofovir and emtricitabine are recommended in first-line treatment. The potentially limited impact of drug resistance should, therefore, be confirmed in daily practice. Surveillance of drug resistance is recommended in areas where PrEP is used. Patients that became infected despite use of PrEP should be closely monitored for virological failure.

Additional Metadata
Keywords HIV, drug resistance, emtricitabine, pre-exposure prophylaxis, tenofovir
Persistent URL dx.doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0b013e32833ff1e6, hdl.handle.net/1765/28116
Grant This work was funded by the European Commission 7th Framework Programme; grant id fp7/223131 - Collaborative HIV and Anti-HIV Drug Resistance Network (CHAIN), This work was funded by the European Commission 7th Framework Programme; grant id fp7/233847 - Computing Real-World Phenomena with Dynamically Changing Complex Networks (DYNANETS)
van de Vijver, D.A.M.C, & Boucher, C.A.B. (2010). The risk of HIV drug resistance following implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 23(6), 621–627. doi:10.1097/QCO.0b013e32833ff1e6