Predicting the Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Current debates and future directions
Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in Western countries. Presently, women in the Netherlands have a 1 : 7 chance of developing breast cancer during their lifetime. This means that in 2008, almost 15,000 women were newly diagnosed with the disease. The incidence of breast cancer in the Netherlands is among the highest in Europe.In 2006, for instance, the age-standardized incidence rate was 128 per 100,000 woman-years. As a comparison, the average in Europe was 94.3 per 100,000 woman-years. Although the probability of cure has improved over the last decennia, for a third of all women with breast cancer, the disease will be fatal. This makes breast cancer the most common cause of cancer death in women in Europe. The age-standardized mortality rate in the Netherlands in 2006 was 29.8 per 100,000 woman-years, versus 26.0 per 100,000 woman-years in Europe. Breast cancer develops as a single malignant cell with uncontrolled cell growth to a tumour of several millimeters or centimeters in diameter. At some point in time, the tumour may reach a size at which it becomes symptomatic. The larger the size, the less likely it is that the tumour can be cured. It is therefore thought that by diagnosing cancer at an earlier phase, for instance by screening, the probability of survival can be increased. Several methods for early detection of breast cancer exist: breast self examination, examination by a clinician or a nurse (‘clinical breast examination’), MRI or ultrasonography. Mammography, which involves one or more X-ray images of the breasts, is considered the best tool for examining postmenopausal women with an average risk for the disease, because it can reach a high sensitivity (>70%) and specificity (>95%) when it is applied on a large scale. At the same time, costs are moderate: 50 euro per screening examination in the Netherlands.The effects of breast cancer screening using mammography were therefore studied in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with various screening ages and intervals. Screening women aged 50 and older resulted in statistically significant reductions in breast cancer mortality, of between 25%–30% in those women that were randomized in the screening arms of the trials. Soon after the first positive trial outcomes, two pilot projects with large-scale mammography screening were started in the Netherlands, which also showed substantial reductions in breast cancer mortality in screened women. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed a favourable balance between screening costs and potential life years gained.15 Based on these findings, mammography screening was implemented in the Netherlands and other western countries.
|Publisher||Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam|
|Promotor||Koning, H.J. de (Harry)|
|Sponsor||This thesis financially supported by the Department of Public Health Erasmus MC and the Erasmus University Rotterdam|
|Keywords||breast cancer, screening|
de Gelder, R.. (2012, April 4). Predicting the Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Current debates and future directions. Erasmus MC: University Medical Center Rotterdam. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/32096