Safety and efficacy of bortezomib in high-risk and elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma
Adverse prognostic factors in multiple myeloma include advanced age, number of prior therapies, and higher International Staging System (ISS) disease stage. In the international, randomised, phase-3 Assessment of Proteasome Inhibition for Extending Remissions (APEX) study, bortezomib demonstrated significantly longer time to progression (TTP), higher response rates and improved survival compared with high-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma following one to three prior therapies. In this APEX subgroup analysis, efficacy of bortezomib and dexamethasone was compared in elderly (age ≥65 years) and high-risk (>1 prior line of therapy; ISS stage II/III; refractory to prior therapy) patients. Bortezomib demonstrated substantial clinical activity in these patients. Response rate (34-40% vs. 13-19%), including complete response rate (5-8% vs. 0-1%), was significantly higher with bortezomib versus dexamethasone in all four subgroups. Similarly, median TTP was significantly longer with bortezomib versus dexamethasone, and 1-year survival probability was significantly higher in all subgroups. As in the total APEX population, rates of grade 3/4 adverse events were higher in bortezomib- versus dexamethasone-treated patients aged ≥65 years and with >1 prior line, while rates of serious adverse events were similar; toxicities generally proved manageable. Bortezomib should be considered an appropriate treatment for elderly and high-risk patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.
|Keywords||Bortezomib, Elderly, High-risk, ISS staging, Multiple myeloma|
|Persistent URL||dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06585.x, hdl.handle.net/1765/35383|
|Journal||British Journal of Haematology|
Richardson, P.G, Sonneveld, P, Schuster, M.W, Irwin, D, Stadtmauer, E.A, Facon, T, … Anderson, K.C. (2007). Safety and efficacy of bortezomib in high-risk and elderly patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. British Journal of Haematology, 137(5), 429–435. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06585.x