Edge detection versus densitometry for assessing coronary stenting quantitatively
The optimal method used to analyze quantitatively the immediate angiographic results of coronary stenting in the coronary arteries has not been studied. Accordingly, minimal luminal cross-sectional area was determined by 2 methods, edge detection and densitometry, in 19 patients who underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and then coronary stent implantation for symptomatic coronary stenoses. The correlation coefficient, 0.73 before angioplasty, decreased to 0.59 after coronary angioplasty and then increased to 0.83 after stent implantation. The mean differences between edge detection and densitometric determinations of minimal luminal cross-sectional area were 0.31 +/- 0.51 mm2 before PTCA, -0.38 +/- 1.22 mm2 after angioplasty and 0.35 +/- 0.79 mm2 after coronary stenting. It is concluded that, although the correlation and variability in the measurement of minimal luminal cross-sectional area between edge detection and densitometry deteriorate after PTCA, they are improved after stenting, probably because of smoothing of the vessel contours by the stent and remodeling of the stented segment into a more circular configuration. Therefore, in the stented coronary artery, edge detection and densitometry are equally acceptable methods of analysis.
|Keywords||*Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, *Coronary Angiography, *Densitometry, X-Ray, *Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, *Stents, Adult, Aged, Cineangiography, Comparative Study, Coronary Disease/radiography/therapy, Female, Human, Male, Middle Aged, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't|
Strauss, B.H., Juilliere, Y., Rensing, B.J.W.M., Reiber, J.H.C., & Serruys, P.W.J.C.. (1991). Edge detection versus densitometry for assessing coronary stenting quantitatively. The American Journal of Cardiology, 67, 484–490. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/4405