Erratum: A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussion (Accounting Review (2010) 85:3 (911-935) DOI: 10/2308/accr.2010.85.3.911)

2013

The Accounting Review , Volume 88 - Issue 1 p. 357

Additional Metadata
Persistent URL	doi.org/10.2308/accr-10326, hdl.handle.net/1765/52571
Journal	The Accounting Review
Organisation	Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus University
Citation APA Style AAA Style APA Style Cell Style Chicago Style Harvard Style IEEE Style MLA Style Nature Style Vancouver Style American-Institute-of-Physics Style Council-of-Science-Editors Style BibTex Format Endnote Format RIS Format CSL Format DOIs only Format	Hunton, J., & Gold-Nöteberg, A. (2013). Erratum: A field experiment comparing the outcomes of three fraud brainstorming procedures: Nominal group, round robin, and open discussion (Accounting Review (2010) 85:3 (911-935) DOI: 10/2308/accr.2010.85.3.911). The Accounting Review, 88(1). doi:10.2308/accr-10326

Publication