1994
Recoil following Wiktor stent implantation for restenotic lesions of coronary arteries
Publication
Publication
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis , Volume 32 - Issue 2 p. 147- 156
The purpose of this study was to determine acute recoil of the vessel wall immediately after Wiktor stent implantation in native coronary arteries of 77 consecutive patients and to assess whether there was compression or “late recoil” of the stent itself at long-term follow-up. Furthermore, the relationship between recoil and a number of clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables was studied in addition to the relation between acute recoil renarrowing or restenosis was assessed. All angiograms were analyzed with the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System using automated edge detection. Acute recoil was defined by the difference between the mean diameter of the fully expanded balloon on which the stent was mounted and the mean diameter of the stented segment. Late recoil was calculated by comparing the mean diameter of the stent itself immediately after implantation and at follow-up without opacification of the vessel. Acute recoil amounted to 0.25 ± 0.32 mm or 8.2%. Multivariate analysis identified sex (coefficient = –0.20, p = 0.04) and stent/artery ratio (coefficient = 0.99, p = 0.0001) as the only independent predictors of acute recoil. “Late recoil” of the stent itself was not observed. The overall difference between the mean diameter of the stent itself immediately after implantation and at follow-up was –0.15 ± 0.33 mm, suggesting an overall increase in diameter of 5.0%. There was no relation between acute recoil and late restenosis. On the contrary, there was a trend towards a greater degree of recoil in patients without restenosis. Moreover, linear regression analysis disclosed a weak but negative correlation between acute recoil and a loss in minimal luminal diameter (coefficient: –0.55, p = 0.04). The Wiktor stent effectively scaffolds the instrumented vessel. Only a minimal amount of acute recoil was noted, which did not contribute to late luminal renarrowing or restenosis. In addition, no late compression of the stent itself was observed. These data suggest that tissue ingrowth into the lumen of the stented segment is the main cause of late luminal renarrowing after stent implantation. © 1994 Wiley-Liss,Inc..
| Additional Metadata | |
|---|---|
| doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810320210, hdl.handle.net/1765/54824 | |
| Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis | |
| Organisation | Department of Cardiology |
|
de Jaegere, P., Serruys, P., van Es, G. A., Bertrand, M., Wiegand, V., Marquis, J. F., … Uebis, R. (1994). Recoil following Wiktor stent implantation for restenotic lesions of coronary arteries. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 32(2), 147–156. doi:10.1002/ccd.1810320210 |
|
