OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the greater late lumen loss after coronary balloon angioplasty in the proximal left anterior descending artery (P-LAD) compared with that in other segments might be related to differences in vascular dimensions or morphology as determined by angiography and intravascular ultrasound imaging. BACKGROUND: The greater late lumen loss after angioplasty in the P-LAD that has been observed in several studies has not been explained. METHODS: We studied 178 patients and 194 coronary artery lesions by quantitative angiography and 30 MHz intravascular ultrasound imaging after successful balloon angioplasty. Vessel wall morphology was compared among three proximal and three nonproximal segments. Follow-up quantitative angiography for late lumen loss calculation was performed in 168 lesions. Multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of late lumen loss. RESULTS: Absolute and relative late loss were significantly greater at the P-LAD compared with the pooled group of other segments (0.42 ± 0.60 mm vs. 0.10 ± 0.48 mm, p = 0.0008 and 0.14 ± 0.24 vs. 0.03 ± 0.17, p < 0.001). Also, a greater percentage of calcific lesions (65% vs. 44%, p = 0.034), a lower incidence of rupture (51% vs. 74%, p = 0.009) and a larger reference segment plaque area (5.4 ± 2.2 mm 2 vs. 4.7 ± 1.9 mm 2, p = 0.05) were found in the P-LAD. In multivariate analysis however, these variables were not predictive of late loss. CONCLUSIONS: Greater late lumen loss after coronary balloon angioplasty of the P-LAD is not explained by differences in atherosclerotic plaque burden or in vessel wall damage. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.

doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00567-7, hdl.handle.net/1765/56860
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Department of Cardiology

Kok, W., Peters, R., Pasterkamp, G., di Mario, C., Serruys, P., Prins, M., & Visser, C. (2000). Greater late lumen loss after successful coronary balloon angioplasty in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery is not explained by extent of vessel wall damage or plaque burden. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35(2), 382–388. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00567-7