2004-07-01
Reply to Cicchetti, Kaufman, and Sparrow
Publication
Publication
Psychology in the Schools , Volume 41 - Issue 6 p. 665- 668
The aim of the review of D.V. Cicchetti, A.S. Kaufman, and S.S. Sparrow (funded by the General Electric Company; this issue) is "to evaluate [the] literature relating the effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) upon neurobehavioral, health-related, and cognitive deficits in neonates, developing infants, children, and adults" (p. 589) on the basis of data derived from seven cohorts. One of these cohorts is the Dutch PCB/dioxin study. The paper of Cicchetti et al. presents a long, winding exercise in criticizing aspects of the design of the seven studies. Here we will give a comment on their review, as far as it concerns our own work. We applied the six fundamental sets of scientific criteria as proposed by Cichetti et al.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.1002/pits.20007, hdl.handle.net/1765/58799 | |
Psychology in the Schools | |
Organisation | Department of Pediatrics |
Weisglas-Kuperus, N., Vreugdenhil, H., & Mulder, P. (2004). Reply to Cicchetti, Kaufman, and Sparrow. Psychology in the Schools (Vol. 41, pp. 665–668). doi:10.1002/pits.20007 |