A randomized trial of hemodiafiltration and change in cardiovascular parameters

Background and objective Increased left ventricularmass (LVM), low ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and high pulse-wave velocity (PWV) relate to overall and cardiovascular mortality in patients with ESRD. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus low-flux hemodialysis (HD) on LVM, EF, and PWV.
Design, setting, participants, & measurements Echocardiography was used to assess LVM and EF in 342 patients in the CONvective TRAnsport STudy followed for up to 4 years. PWV was measured in 189 patients for up to 3 years. Effect of HDF versus HD on LVM, EF, and PWV was evaluated using linear mixed models.
Results Patients had a mean age of 63 years, and 61%weremale. At baseline,median LVMwas 227 g (interquartile range [IQR], 183-279 g), andmedian EFwas 65%(IQR, 55%-72%).Median PWVwas 9.8m/s (IQR, 7.5-12.0m/s). There was no significant difference between the HDF and HD treatment groups in rate of change in LVM (HDF: change,20.9 g/yr [95%confidence interval (95%CI),28.9 to 7.7 g];HD: change, 12.5 g/yr [95%CI,23.0 to 27.5 g]; P for difference=0.13), EF (HDF: change,20.3%/yr [95%CI,22.3% to 1.8%];HD: change,23.4%/yr [95% CI, 25.9% to 20.9%]; P=0.17), or PWV (HDF: change, 20.0 m/s per year [95% CI, 20.4 to 0.4 m/s); HD: change, 0.0 m/s per year [95% CI, 20.3 to 0.2 m/s]; P=0.89). No differences in rate of change between treatment groups were observed for subgroups of age, sex, residual kidney function, dialysis vintage, history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or convection volume.
Conclusions Treatment with online HDF did not affect changes in LVM, EF, or PWV over time compared with HD.