Influence of gender, parity, and caloric load on gastrorectal response in healthy subjects: A barostat study

The gastrocolonic response consists of a prompt increase in colonic tone after a meal. With a barostat and a high compliant air-filled bag, it is possible to measure rectal tone by recording changes in volume at a constant intrabag pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the gastrorectal response in males and females as well as the effect of different caloric loads on the gastrorectal response. In 33 volunteers a barostat procedure during basal conditions and after a 600-kcal meal was performed. In 26 volunteers the procedure was repeated with a 1000-kcal meal. A meal response was defined as a decrease in volume of more than 10%. Phasic volume events (PVE) were defined as a 10% decrease in volume of 15-60 sec duration. After a 600-kcal meal, the decrease in volume after 1 hr was 28 ± 7% (mean ± SEM, P < 0.001). A meal response was found in 64% of the subjects. Parous females had a diminished meal response compared with nulliparous females (2 ± 5% and 48 ± 11%, P < 0.001). After the 600-kcal meal, PVEs increased from 3 to 10/hr (P = 0.001). In the 26 subjects, volume decrease was 40 ± 9% after the 1000-kcal meal and 20 ± 7% after the 600-kcal meal (P = 0.28). In the high-calorie meal, 18 subjects (69%) had a response versus 14 (54%) in the low-calorie meal (NS). Enhancing the caloric load of the meal did not increase the amounts of PVEs. In conclusion, a gastrorectal response occurs in 64% of the healthy subjects after a 600-kcal meal. The gastrorectal response can be measured to a similar extent in men and nulliparous women; however, the response is significantly impaired in parous women. This is possibly due to neurogenic damage during childbirth. Increasing the caloric load did not increase the gastrorectal response. Therefore, to study gastrorectal meal response with the barostat, a meal of 600-kcal is sufficient and a correction for parity should be made when results are compared.

• View at Publisher
• View at Pubmed
• View at Scopus
• View at Web of Science