Aims Patient treatment expectations may affect cardiac outcomes; however, till date, no validated instruments have been developed to monitor treatment expectations in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study evaluates the predictive value of the newly developed 10-item EXPECtations Towards ICD therapy (EXPECT-ICD) in relation to anxiety, depression, and ICD related concerns 3 months post-implant. Methods and results Consecutive implanted ICD patients were included as part of the WEB-based distress management programme for ICD patients (WEBCARE) trial from six Dutch referral hospitals. The patients completed the baseline questionnaires briefly after ICD implantation. Information on clinical variables was captured from the patients' medical records. Patients' treatment expectations as assessed with the EXPECT-ICD questionnaire could best be represented with a two-factor model involving both negative (α = 0.84) and positive expectations (α = 0.77) with a score range of 0-20 for each factor. Negative treatment expectations were associated with higher levels of anxiety (β = 0.443; P < 0.001), depression (β = 0.506; P < 0.001), and ICD concerns (β = 0.428; P < 0.001) 3 months post-implant after controlling for demographic and clinical factors. Positive expectations were not related to any of the distress outcomes. Conclusion Negative expectations were associated with anxiety, depression, and ICD concerns 3 months post-implant. The current findings indicate that the EXPECT-ICD scale is a reliable, valid, and disease-specific measure of the treatment expectations in ICD patients. Future research needs to investigate whether addressing the patients' expectations might improve the outcome and the subjective well-being of ICD patients.

, ,
doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu006, hdl.handle.net/1765/71854
Europace
Department of Cardiology

Habibović, M., Pedersen, S., van den Broek, K., & Denollet, J. (2014). Monitoring treatment expectations in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator using the EXPECT-ICD scale. Europace, 16(7), 1022–1027. doi:10.1093/europace/euu006