Currents and Sub-currents in the River of Innovations - Explaining Innovativeness using New-Product Announcements
In their seminal paper, Acs and Audretsch (1988) analyze innovation patterns across industries and identify several determinants of innovativeness, both positive and negative. Their work is seminal if only because of the unique data they use to measure innovativeness: new-product announcements. They show that industry concentration, degree of unionization would hamper innovation; industries characterized by increased shares of skilled labor and large firms provide favorable conditions for innovation. By analyzing a new and more consciously compiled database, we re-examine their original claims. Our results largely support the findings of Acs & Audretsch, but diverge from them in one important way. We suggest that the large firms do not contribute more to a industry’s innovativeness than small firms – a vindication of the Schumpeter Mark I perspective. In addition, we analyze micro-level data of individual firms. Firms within different sub-groups respond differently to their competitive environment. We show that less dedicated innovators prove more susceptible to environmental factors than more committed innovators. In addition, an unfavorable competitive environment decreases the likelihood that less successful innovators will announce new products.
|Keywords||Innovation, Innovation Sub-Currents, New-Product Announcements, Schumpeter Mark I|
|Publisher||Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM)|
Dolfsma, W.A., & van der Panne, G.. (2006). Currents and Sub-currents in the River of Innovations - Explaining Innovativeness using New-Product Announcements (No. ERS-2006-036-ORG). ERIM report series research in management Erasmus Research Institute of Management. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/7943