The seriousness of the incorporation problem in interdisciplinary legal research, this article argues, depends on how legal research is understood. If legal research is understood as a single, inherently interdisciplinary discipline, the problem largely falls away. On this view, the incorporation of other disciplines into legal research is what legal academics have for the last 40 years already successfully been doing. If, on the other hand, legal research is best conceived as a multi-disciplinary field, consisting of a core discipline – doctrinal research – and various other types of mono-disciplinary and interdisciplinary research, the incorporation of other disciplines presents real difficulties. For legal academics engaged in socio-legal research, in particular, two problems arise: the practical problem of trying to address a legal pro- fessional and academic audience at the same time and the philosophical problem of trying to integrate the internal perspective of doctrinal research with the external perspective of other disciplines. In the final part of the article, these practical and philosophical difficulties are illustrated by reference to the author’s research on the politics of judicial review in new democracies.

, , , ,
Erasmus Law Review
doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000039, hdl.handle.net/1765/79732
Erasmus Law Review
Erasmus Law Review
Erasmus School of Law

Roux, T. (2015). The Incorporation Problem in Interdisciplinary Legal Research. Erasmus Law Review, 8(2), 55–64. doi:10.5553/ELR.000039