2016-12-01
Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I—clinical impact
Publication
Publication
Prenatal Diagnosis , Volume 36 - Issue 12 p. 1083- 1090
Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact of nationwide implementation of genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in pregnancies at increased risk for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 (TRIDENT study). Method: Women with elevated risk based on first trimester combined testing (FCT ≥ 1:200) or medical history, not advanced maternal age alone, were offered NIPT as contingent screening test, performed by Dutch University Medical laboratories. We analyzed uptake, test performance, redraw/failure rate, turn-around time and pregnancy outcome. Results: Between 1 April and 1 September 2014, 1413/23 232 (6%) women received a high-risk FCT result. Of these, 1211 (85.7%) chose NIPT. One hundred seventy-nine women had NIPT based on medical history. In total, 1386/1390 (99.7%) women received a result, 6 (0.4%) after redraw. Mean turn-around time was 14 days. Follow-up was available in 1376 (99.0%) pregnancies. NIPT correctly predicted 37/38 (97.4%) trisomies 21, 18 or 13 (29/30, 4/4 and 4/4 respectively); 5/1376 (0.4%) cases proved to be false positives: trisomies 21 (n = 2), 18 (n = 1) and 13 (n = 2). Estimated reduction in invasive testing was 62%. Conclusion: Introduction of NIPT in the Dutch National healthcare-funded Prenatal Screening Program resulted in high uptake and a vast reduction of invasive testing. Our study supports offering NIPT to pregnant women at increased risk for fetal trisomy. © 2016 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. © 2016 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Metadata | |
---|---|
doi.org/10.1002/pd.4945, hdl.handle.net/1765/94873 | |
Prenatal Diagnosis | |
Organisation | Department of Clinical Genetics |
Oepkes, D., Page-Christiaens, G.C.L. (G. C. Lieve), Bax, C., Bekker, M., Bilardo, C. M., Boon, E., … Sistermans, E. (2016). Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I—clinical impact. Prenatal Diagnosis, 36(12), 1083–1090. doi:10.1002/pd.4945 |